Sparta: The First Communist Society?

napoleon526

Emperor
Joined
Mar 12, 2002
Messages
3,694
Location
Baltimore, MD
While doing some research on ancient Greece, it struck me how the society created by the city of Sparta reflected Marxist/Leninist ideas.

By 600 BC, Greece had entered a period of great prosperity. It's location allowed it to dominate the grape and olive trade, and many city-states became wealthy. But wealth always leads to conflict between those who have it and those who don't. In order to avoid these conflicts, Sparta came up with a unique plan: conflict over wealth would be eliminated by getting rid of wealth. Every Spartan citizen, regardless of social standing, lived the same way. There were no outward displays of wealth; everybody lived the same 'Spartan' lifestyle. Perhaps most radically, gold and silver, two substances most associated with capitalism, were banned. Iron bars were used in the few circumstances where exchange was required, but for the most part there was no need for money, since there was nothing to buy.

Sparta also reflected Communist ideology through the way its citizens lived their lives. There was no freedom to choose your occupation: all male citizens were trained to be soldiers from the age of six. Spartan children endured extremely tough living standards, and most were forced to steal in order to survive, although they were punished if caught. This was supposed to encourage cleverness among the young recruits, and was as close to any form of independent thinking as was allowed. Citizens were not encouraged to think for themselves: everybody in society was a cog in a giant machine that was the state.

There are other interesting similarites between Sparta and more modern communist countries. Spartans had a great respect for the elderly, who deserved respect since they had lived in the Spartan system so long and were undoubtedly verterans of many battles. In order to be a member of the governing council (an Archon), a warrior had to be at least 60 years old, which was really old in those days of warfare and disease. This brings to mind the policy of the Soviet Union, which in the Breznev years became almost a gerontocracy, headed by councils of withered, conservative-minded old men.

Of course, Spartan society did have its definite un-socialist characteristics, such as the reason that the militaristic society existed in the first place: the conquest and subjugation of Sparta's neighbors. The only reason that the magnificent Spartan army came into being was to discourage uprisings among the helot population. And unlike communism, which tends to be a universalizing ideology, the Spartans had no interest in exporting their system to others.

These are just some thoughts I had. If anybody else has any other thoughts on this topic, please feel free to post.
 
i came to teh same conclution in my world history ap class last year............and i came up w/ an easy way to remember teh fights between athens and sparta
the cold war:
democracy, freedom, culture, traders (capitalists) athens = US and alles

communism,military centered govt,not care much about culture, mega large military. sparta = USSR
it might not be perfect but it did helped my on a couple of tests ^_^
 
Rather than communist, I prefer to think of Sparta as egalitarian. Nothing in the ancient/medieval world can come close to a Soviet-style system, simply 'cause of technology, size, implemented state ideology etc.
 
Originally posted by napoleon526
While doing some research on ancient Greece, it struck me how the society created by the city of Sparta reflected Marxist/Leninist ideas.

What ???

A better term would be IMHO "Sparta the first nazist state" !!
Just think at hilottes treatement in ancient Sparta ...

Regards,
 
Sorry, but no, the Spartans had a King, were deeply superstious, and were heavy into slavery, NOTHING like communism, real or percieved.

The Analogy is superficial at best, and it doesn't come close to reality.
 
There were also the socalled ephors I think. they were young men traing for hoplite status. One of their 'exercises' were to go out in the middle of the night to kill a helot, a member of the subjugated peoples around Sparta proper. Since they were only allowed to arm themselves with a single knife it was perhaps not an easy task to accomplish.

I think the Sparta = Russia and Athens = America synthesis is valid to a point within reasonable bounds. I know that the former coummunist countries felt a cultural affinity with the Spartans that were.
 
This is more wishful thinking than anything else.

The one thing you completely neglect from your analysis is a greater economic review of the situation. You touch on the gold and silver issue for a bit, but this is generally unresolved - for a comparison of something which is essentially an economic theory, I thought this a bit poor.

Communism as blueprint is, basically, nothing like the Spartan design. At least, if you were referencing The Spartan model on true Utopian Communism, then no, they are not alike.

Utopian Communism relies upon complete control of the means of production by the people, and theoretically should have no limits on the individual, either personal or economic whatsoever. By this point also, the state will have faded into insignifigance. None of that applies to the analysis.

What your analysis did do was draw on the recognisable traits of Stalinism more than anything else, as far as I could tell. However, the large majority of what you point out is inherent in jsut about every dictatorial system, be it Fascist, Communist, or whatever. I found that intresting, however, as a reference against Communism, no It didn't hold up for me. It did come across to me as a sort of proto-dictatorial system, but nothing more. It neither struck me as particularly right wing or left wing.
 
Originally posted by Alcibiaties of Athenae
Sorry, but no, the Spartans had a King, were deeply superstious, and were heavy into slavery, NOTHING like communism, real or percieved.

The Analogy is superficial at best, and it doesn't come close to reality.
In response to AoA's and others' comments, I will try to defend my hypothesis:

First of all, Sparta had TWO kings, which could cancel out each other's decisions. Their society was suspicious and distrustful of landed aristocracy, especially the type that existed in Athens. Also, I'm not saying that Sparta was a true communism, just that it had ELEMENTS of socialism/communism in its society, as well as several parallels to the system set up by the Soviet Union, which was definitely not Socialism as Marx would have seen it.

As for the slavery issue, is being a helot in Messinia really that much different from being a subsistence farmer in the Ukraine? During collectivization, many Soviet peasants were forced at gunpoint to give up much of their produce for the alleged good of the state. Spartan helots were treated in much the same way. In regards to the economic points, I'll admit that economies in classical Greece and Industrial Russia are radically diverse, and probably cannot be realistically compared. But the elimination of currency, the idea that the government chooses your job and lifestyle, and the narrowing of class lines are all proto-communist ideas. I believe that Marx also discussed the Spartan 'plan' in his works, though I have neither the time nor the energy to read Das Kapital and make sure.
 
Also the spartans really hated tyranny. So every time a tyrant took over the controls in Athens the disaffected would run to Sparta for help. Sparta would then march on Athens and restore Democracy. Much the same as whenever a despot pops up in Europe the Russians usually ends up helping in deposing him.
 
Originally posted by Dr. Dr. Doktor
Also the spartans really hated tyranny. So every time a tyrant took over the controls in Athens the disaffected would run to Sparta for help. Sparta would then march on Athens and restore Democracy. Much the same as whenever a despot pops up in Europe the Russians usually ends up helping in deposing him.

This might be going too far. They wouldn't really restore 'democracy;' they would install a government that was more friendly to Sparta.
 
Do you mean democracy and friendliness are not complementary?

I wonder if Leonid Bresnev was named after the famous hero of Thermopylai, Leonidas?
 
Sparta seems to have been more like a state that was in a Soviet exsistence, which ultimately, was not Utopian Communism.

It does seem to be Communism as it has thus far been practiced, though many others have pointed out distinctions. Personally, I believe it to be a combinitaion of Feudalism and Serfdom, more or less, just as the rest of the world taken to an extreme in order to best serve the military interests of the nation; it did not seem to have the objective of an egalitarian society. It was a primitive similarity, but never sought to achieve the later-developed ideals of Marx, and therefore could not really be considered Communist. Rather, such was used simply as a tool for the military, as the citizens didn't really need any of the wealth and therefore it could be used on ithe armed forces.

I'll give you an A for insight though :goodjob:.
 
I think the earliest communist community would be the catacomb Christiams of the the 2nd and 3rd centuries. Everyone owned everything in common, poverty was shared.

Mao in the march to the sea was fairly close to a military version of communism. When he gained power he immediately threw it out in favor of establishing a ruling council, with himself at the head. Effectively a king and a court.

One is inclined to believe communism only works in a society where survival is tenuous and the needs of the whole clearly outweigh any personal needs.

J
 
Originally posted by onejayhawk

One is inclined to believe communism only works in a society where survival is tenuous and the needs of the whole clearly outweigh any personal needs.

Makes me think of the 1984 saying "War is Peace."
 
Top Bottom