Well, it happened both before and after the reinstall...
It doesn't happen to other people, it's still your computer.
Well, it happened both before and after the reinstall...
For the pdf's, its not firefox's fault. Its Adobe's fault. I have Foxit installed and that opens pdf's in under 5 seconds ( reasonably sized ) even on this dinky P3 laptop.
The only plugins I have got running are adblock and stumbleupon. Should those really cause FF to load about half a minute slower than IE or Chrome when I boot the machine?
Once I am surfing, I have no problems other than opening PDFs, which FF also sucks at.
What ad are you people talking about? The little thingy up in the top right corner that changes every so often? If that annoyed you enough to switch, you have some problems besides not being able to choose a pdf reader.
As for the slower startup time, Firefox is a multi platform application and thus can't use the native Windows toolkit. Instead, it uses the GTK one (AFAIK), which has to be loaded during startup. It will always load slower than an otherwise equally optimized native application.
Then you might as well never use Windows Update, or Windows for that matter. How much of the stuff you see there is advertisements?I won't have advertisements on my computer. Everyone draws the line at some point, and I chose to have no tolerance for ads.
If Foxit was commercial, I might consider buying it, as it stands, it isn't an option for me.
Then you might as well never use Windows Update, or Windows for that matter. How much of the stuff you see there is advertisements?
If Foxit was commercial, I might consider buying it, as it stands, it isn't an option for me.
What are you guys talking about. Firefox uses less memory than either Opera, IE or Crome. THere are online tests on it, check them out. My personal experience also confirms this.
My point was that Opera (apparently) does the same thing as Firefox, but uses fewer resources.