Thlayli
Le Pétit Prince
It was 10f for 4e, though you can have up to 30f for no additional charge if you need it.
/me politely points out that 30f for 4e is much cheaper than that.
OOC: with shipping the costs would both still be horrendous....
title: "lofg" to "rpc.yan."
orig: 247cthdrl
addressee: "rpc.yan."
greetings.
lofg loans survive government transitions. ref# 1.32.45 "stnd.loan.doc"
furthermore, additional securities request due to increase risk profile. ref# 2.78.1 "stnd.loan.doc"
failure to furnish securities inadvisable. ref# "apl.irs.t&c.useofforce"
maring
Disenfrancised in the pre-thread said:After swatting away the space fleet a long ground campaign ensued, the Apeilics perhaps afraid of their own destructive powers after Datha. The ground campaign was made frustrating for the Apeilic commanders by the crazy and resourceful Standard frontiersmen but ultimately they succeeded.
I'm going to put this out of order so that I can get to the real meat of this argument first.4. The intention of my story was not to be a propaganda brochure, but a personal recollection. You strained the IC/OOC boundary in responding to it in such a fashion. You know, you could have just approached me with your objections personally, and I would have made some edits. But instead you decided to be a dick. Though I suppose that *is* acting in character for the Praxzen, the ultimate arrogant douchebags of the Segmentum.
See Dis's post. Furthermore: no, you're wrong, there are no terraforming options available that deal with radiation, there are modifications that do it. Considering the vast number of lifeforms that deal with radiation, like fungi that absorb gamma radiation and bacteria that live in nuclear reactors, I could say that you picked the most overkill solution to the problem of radiation (and one that's setting inappropiate) but really I was just teasing you for picking the most boring one possible.1. Terraforming actions to reduce radiation are available technology, so whether that's possible via nanotechnology or other means, it's available. I realize nanotech is kind of your berserk button, but take a few deep breaths. I'll even edit the sentence 'nanotech to keep the rad levels down' to 'tech to keep the rad levels down' to pacify you.
That's a horrible analogy and you know it. Using tactical nuclear weapons in the Cold War was clearly stupid given you know, escalation and MAD, something that obviously did not exist between the Standards and Iris. Furthermore there is the issue of proportionality and lethality; militaries do not always use the biggest baddest weapon just for giggles, they tend to employ the one best suited to the job. Randomly nuking swamps is extremely crude when there are five thousand other, better (more effective) ways to hunt and kill people. (For example: if the Iris was testing biological weapons on you or hiring someone else to do it, why would they also nuke you? That would hurt viral dispersion and be weapon fratricide, making it a rather stupid waste of resources.)2. Second Age conventions probably barred incinerating a trillion people with solar flares too. So that's not exactly a compelling argument. And we all know that the war got brutal and desperate. In dis' own description it was described as total war. The *point* of my story was that the Iris could have used higher technology solutions to wipe out the Standards and chose to do it in an uglier fashion, because they wanted to make an example of them to Datha's other allies. To use a similar example: The US didn't nuke Vietnam just because it was the highest-technology option available, they used napalm, because the situation didn't demand the use of nuclear technology.
Which is why there are still Standards at all, right? Because they wanted to totally wipe you out and were willing to go to any lengths to do so. Which is why they murdered you in the depths of interstellar space instead of herding you like cats into a sector where you'd be irrelevant. Oh, wait, I got those mixed up. I mean geeze, man, we talked about this the other day.An extended ground campaign with no end in sight, carried out by hardened soldiers who had already seen (and done) far too much? This was a backwater theatre in the war that demanded a quick and dirty resolution.
Iris Commander is totes just hauling around WEP1 fission bombs on his CON13 Salamander because???I think a frustrated Apeilic commander could very easily be convinced to nuke the Standards to make a point about resistance.
Standards killed by T1 mercenaries in ultimate surprise knockout! That or the Iris is subcontracting to people who still use refined fission because???Maybe they had sub-contracted most of the war effort to less scrupulous, less advanced allies? And if you don't agree, it's my background so f-off.
See Dis's post. Also, the easiest way to be immune to a virus is to just write it to play on sequences you don't have or to just innoculate your population to it.3. Virus bombs are a thing, so clearly the weaponization of plagues is background-based. And if the Iris did have wet nanotech and were immune to viruses, that'd be another incentive for them to try it out on the Standard populace.
Testing a biological agent on a random irrelevant battlefield is plausible, I'll give you this one, but why would you bother with being discovered when you have computational power that's massively superior to the very best today has to offer at a mere COM2 or COM3 and can just simulate diffusion? Live trials sorta lose their luster unless you're just cartoonishly evil or just really hate the test population (doesn't fit the Iris well unless they wanted to thin your population to make you easier to herd).But let's table that side of the discussion since I removed the nanotechnology reference. However, I specifically said in my story that it wasn't necessarily the Iris that was doing it. Mercenaries, corporations, rogue third parties, there are a lot of options here.
Alright, this is where a lack of familiarity with the material is showing through. Long term radiation damage and fallout are specific attributes of fission bombs, because they tend to mostly be composed of weapons material that didn't fission, or the products that did fission. This is why the contaminants tend to be fairly heavy. Fusion weapons and antimatter weapons don't do this. A fusion weapon would generally produce a neutron flux that could make things (depending on what they are) somewhat radioactive for 5-15 years (again, depending). An antimatter weapon would radiate a lot of gammas and kill everything nearby but otherwise not leave much residue, unless you had some photofission induction or something. All of them work primarily on heat and blast, not on radiation; that has always been an after-effect.I didn't really say that the Iris used low-tech fission busters. Maybe they used hydrogen fusion.
Antimatter is not a "planet killer" weapon. It is also not inherently a high-end weapon, because the blast you get depends on the amount you use. You could, if you wanted to, use antimatter in place of C4 for minor demolitions. There is absolutely nothing preventing it from being used tactically, especially given intermixing smaller quantities of matter/antimatter for optimal detonation is much easier with a smaller bomb.They had to tread a fine line, which is why they used a mid-range weapon like nukes. Cause too much damage (like blowing the planet up with antimatter) and people in civilized space start getting (even more) nervous about atrocities. Cause too little and the Standards will *never* stop fighting, because they're Standards.
Ruining people is not the same thing as ruining a planet. People (baselines) are cheap. Decent planets are expensive. Why screw up the real estate when you can just sell it to some poor sap after the war? This, incidentally, is one of the big reasons neutron bombs were pioneered (although they never worked as described, and biowar was always a better method of doing the same thing).The dichotomy between the military hardliners and the pragmatists that dis highlighted in his first story would explain why the Iris would be willing to ruin Standard using relatively crude methods, i.e. an echelon of their military leadership acting outside of strictly official bounds or on their own initiative.