The 12th Planet

[Perfection]

I used my celestia program and ran time backwards, the approach of nibiru coincides with some big events. Including the great deluge (noah's flood) at around 11,000 bc, which is also the same time that an Ice Age came to an abrupt end.

You want to back up those dates? I've always heard the ice age ended at 10,000 BC

According to Sitchin, the gravitational influence of Nibiru, which is about the size of neptune or uranus,

Is it big as them masswise or volumetrically?

somehow caused thousands of square miles of an ice sheet to slide into the ocean, causing a massive tsunami, which headed straight for the mideast (where noah's flood took place.)

So they have no idea how the mechanism works, that's not good.

Also, according to Sitchin, the nibiruan gov't chose to keep the calamity a secret from man, but someone broke this "oath" and told someone (noah) about it, and helped him to build not an ark, but a submarine. I also took celestia back half a million years.

You want to show some evidence for that?

Yep, it coincided with the timeline. Thank "god" (i don't believe in god) for computers, eh?

I doubt it, I bet if it was at 8000 BC or 9000BC you'd still ssay it correpsonded with the flood.

 

[PlutonianEmpire]

Here's noah's flood:

(I changed Earth's name to Tiamat and added a few fictional planets just for kicks.)

The date is in the upper right corner. A glitch makes Celestia use the "-" sign instead of "BC."

 

[Perfection]

Here's noah's flood:

Umm, how do you know that was when Noah's flood was? (If that did occur)

 

[PlutonianEmpire]

And here's the date of the 1st arrival.

 

[PlutonianEmpire]

Umm, how do you know that was when Noah's flood was? (If that did occur)

According to the timeline I gave you earlier.

 

[Perfection]

And here's the date of the 1st arrival.

Ummm three things?
1. What's the first arrival?
2. What is the calander date of the first arrival?
3. How do you know it's the date of the first arrival?

 

[Perfection]

According to the timeline I gave you earlier.

And what evidence is there that the flood occured around 11,000 BC, other then some timeline said so?

 

[PlutonianEmpire]

I think that the evidence is in some sort of carbon dating glacier thingamajig. I have absolutely no Idea.

The 1st arrival is when the Nibiruan landed on Earth for the 1st time. The date of the 1st Arrival in the 2nd picture above is either that, or this, 3600 years later. But to be honest with you, no one truly knows EXACTLY when they 1st landed. This is just speculation.

 

[Perfection]

I think that the evidence is in some sort of carbon dating glacier thingamajig. I have absolutely no Idea.

So if you have no idea why it's that date and just say it because it's on someone's timeline that date isn't the most accurate now is it? Certainly not enough to base a claim of coincidence off of!

The 1st arrival is when the Nibiruan landed on Earth for the 1st time. The date of the 1st Arrival in the 2nd picture above is either that, or this, 3600 years later. But to be honest with you, no one truly knows EXACTLY when they 1st landed. This is just speculation.

So then why'd you post it? It doesn't stregthen your arguement!

 

[Chukchi Husky]

I used my celestia program and ran time backwards, the approach of nibiru coincides with some big events. Including the great deluge (noah's flood) at around 11,000 bc, which is also the same time that an Ice Age came to an abrupt end.

1: The Biblical Flood was supposed to take place around 6th millennium BC. The lastest theory is that rising sea levels in the Mediterranian overflowed into what is now the Black Sea, at an estimate of 10 cubic miles a day, for two years.
2: There were fluctuations in the climate at the end of the Ice Age, beginning 14,500 years ago, when the climate became warmer. Farming began in the fertile cresent around this time which florished for 2000 years, until around 12,600 years ago when the climate became colder with Ice Age conditions for 1000 years. The farmers became nomads, until the rise of temperature 11,600 years ago.

 

[PlutonianEmpire]

@Perfection
Do you hate me, Perfection? If so, tell me the truth, please.

 

[Perfection]

@Perfection
Do you hate me, Perfection? If so, tell me the truth, please.

I don't hate you, I'm just not buying your theory.

 

[Xen]

no, he dosetn hate you, but we both share a mututal hatred and contempt of new-age bred poppy cock, it appears.

I'm also farmore inclined to belive prefection over nay other resident here, because he has volums of mathmatical, and general physic based, and, IIRC< astronomical science knowledge, he knows what hes talkign about, for he has proven it time and time agian before, while the best evidence you can give all hinges if what you sllge to be true is true int he first place, hwich is not at all likelly, I must conceed.

 

[PlutonianEmpire]

I'm a terrible arguer, I know.

@Xen
You know him more than I do. I'm just new to this forum (and stupid ). I was never very good at my math classes.

 

[Perfection]

I'm also farmore inclined to belive prefection over nay other resident here, because he has volums of mathmatical, and general physic based, and, IIRC< astronomical science knowledge, he knows what hes talkign about, for he has proven it time and time agian before, while the best evidence you can give all hinges if what you sllge to be true is true int he first place, hwich is not at all likelly, I must conceed.

Well, I wouldn't go that far, CarlosMM Col and Betazed are all very sceintifically learned. They've all three pointed out valid errors in my arguements.

 

[Xen]

talent at argumentig matters very, very, very little; for all you need to win an argument is proof; somthing that you are greatlly lacking with all this.

 

[PlutonianEmpire]

I'm 19 years old. I'm supposed to lack proof in matters like this.

 

[Perfection]

talent at argumentig matters very, very, very little; for all you need to win an argument is proof; somthing that you are greatlly lacking with all this.

I'm going to disagree, in ths forum I've argued things that have later been shown to be false, and have won them. I recall an arguement about chemistry that I convinced the other side that steroisomerism was the same thing as chirality, which it is not.

 

[Perfection]

I'm 19 years old. I'm supposed to lack proof in matters like this.

I'm 18 and I can give proof.

 

[PlutonianEmpire]

I also never leave my room, and spend more time playing civ2 and flying celestia, and less time studying.