The destruction of the Free and the Brave

[Kayak]

Until a socialist is in the White House, I won't like anyone you elect, "liberal" or "conservative," because there's no freaking difference.

You have a tough row to hoe Pasi.

 

[Bronx Warlord]

Both the Anti-Terror Laws and the War on Terror were designed to 'protect' us from terrorism, yet there were no attacks on British Soil before the invasion, only after.

Over the last twenty years there have been more attacks of terror on British Soil than on American Soil.

You Americans polarize yourselves as "liberals" and "conservatives"

You seem to be pretty good at feeding into it, generalizeing a bit much prehaps? nahhhhhhhhhhhhh

If we caught Osama tomorrow how would you try him?

Two to the chest one to the head.

 

[Kayak]

Two to the chest one to the head.

So you would do to him what he would do to you? Interesting.

 

[Bronx Warlord]

So you would do to him what he would do to you? Interesting.

I'd most likely stab him in the liver and smoke a cig while he died slowly, lord forbid I know. Bad Bronx. Forget your family friends that worked in WTC, forget about the people on the planes, forget about it all. bullfeathers. I'd choke him with his own fecal covered intestines if I could.

Then again it's just MHO and nothing more

 

[PrinceOfLeigh]

Over the last twenty years there have been more attacks of terror on British Soil than on American Soil.

You've taken that quote out of context given that I established earlier that I was talking about Islamic Terrorism. Despite that I have to confess that I've missed your point somewhat.

 

[Bronx Warlord]

You've taken that quote out of context given that I established earlier that I was talking about Islamic Terrorism. Despite that I have to confess that I've missed your point somewhat.

We still have the attack on the Embassy in London were the SAS were on TV preforming a textbook assault on a building. I think you do make a good point but I think your a bit off in blaming the US/UK invasion. I think the blame should fall on the people planting the bombs, it was there choice to act apon whatever twisted feelings they had.

 

[Pasi Nurminen]

You seem to be pretty good at feeding into it, generalizeing a bit much prehaps? nahhhhhhhhhhhhh

Not in the slightest. Anywhere you go in the media, whether it's mass and mainstream or obscure and conspiricist, you see nothing more than people slandering each other as right wing, left wing, far right, far left, liberal, conservative. You'll see people engage in shouting matches labelling people as liberal and conservative elite. Americans just huff and puff about conservatives and liberals without managing to have a clue what they're talking about. Hell, the only real point people opposed to Kerry in the last election had against him was that he was "too liberal." You'd see people opposed to him regurgitate the same articles saying some random academician said that Kerry was "the most liberal senator in America" and failing to elaborate on the point, as if calling someone "liberal" was an insult.

 

[PrinceOfLeigh]

We still have the attack on the Embassy in London were the SAS were on TV preforming a textbook assault on a building.

I was refering to Islamic Terrorism, the kind the "War on Terror" has been trying to combat. The Siege at the Iranian Embassy was more of a hostage crisis aimed at Iran rather than an attack on the West Source

I think you do make a good point but I think your a bit off in blaming the US/UK invasion. I think the blame should fall on the people planting the bombs, it was there choice to act apon whatever twisted feelings they had.

You misunderstand me. I did not say that I blamed the US/UK invasion, although I can understand why it upset many people. I was merely stating that the 2nd Iraq War was the bomber's motive. There was, IIRC, a report detailing exactly that but until I have time to find it this will have to do

 

[zulu9812]

Actually, it was. Every single issue that you want to try and use to divert attention away from this fact only reinforces the point.

If you want to discuss it further, PM me or maybe start a new thread?

Sorry to wonder off-topic, but actually Skadistic is correct. The American Civil War was fought primarily to establish federal control, at the expense of confederatism.

 

[zulu9812]

There is no "right to privacy" in the U.S. Constitution.

There is, however, the right to be free from undue suspicion.

 

[zulu9812]

A little reminder for ya, Pasi: next time a Democrat is the U.S. President, and some guy like Zulu is posting anti-Democrat-President articles left and right about all the alleged screw-ups that Democrat President is allegedly committing, and you start typing on your keyboard to tell that anti-Democrat-President poster to shut the hell up....

....think of me.

As I have said previously, the US government is ALWAYS conservative - it's simply a question of to what degree. I can assure you that I will be making anti-American posts for as long as the need is there...

...which will be a long time

 

[.Shane.]

Sorry to wonder off-topic, but actually Skadistic is correct. The American Civil War was fought primarily to establish federal control, at the expense of confederatism.

Absolutely wrong. You might as well argue the Holocaust didn't happen and that the federal govt. has no right to tax.