The European Project: the future of the EU.

Awesome (non)answer. Anyway, if you think the main countries want to federalize, you are living the dream. Removing veto - or removing Orban - won't change that.
 
Awesome (non)answer. Anyway, if you think the main countries want to federalize, you are living the dream. Removing veto - or removing Orban - won't change that.

Given the small size of European countries, what fate do you expect them to face in the coming decades if they don’t join forces?

I'm asking so because I hardly see what could be hoped for other than becoming larger powers pawns. That's already what's going on actually.
 
Last edited:
why their small sizes a problem ? A believer in the coming Russian invasion ? An American invasion ? Need to defend democracy in Africa ?
 
why their small sizes a problem ? A believer in the coming Russian invasion ? An American invasion ? Need to defend democracy in Africa ?

The answer is already given in the post you're answering to: to keep a hand on our own fate.
 
ı am impressed the 5 minute limit on editing posts still exists .
 
Given the small size of European countries, what fate do you expect them to face in the coming decades if they don’t join forces?

I'm asking so because I hardly see what could be hoped for other than becoming larger powers pawns. That's already what's going on actually.
There is no basis for claiming that (say) Germany wants the Eu to federalize. Are you of the view that removing the veto will somehow make it want it?
Because that was the remarkable claim, that supposedly removing the veto is a "first step" to federalization - a claim that flies in the face of any logic.
 
There is no basis for claiming that (say) Germany wants to federalize. Are you of the view that removing the veto will somehow make it want to?
Because that was the remarkable claim, that supposedly removing the veto is a "first step" to federalization - a claim that flies in the face of any logic.

I wasn't necessarily thinking about federalizing. You're against the EU or whatever other ways for European countries to join their forces. Yet if we don't do so, again, I can't see what we can expect more than becoming pawns in the hands of larger powers, hence my skepticism. But maybe do you think we would be better off? In such a case I would be interested to know how do you think it would be the case.
 
I wasn't necessarily thinking about federalizing. You're against the EU or whatever other ways for European countries to join their forces. Yet if we don't do so, again, I can't see what we can expect more than becoming pawns in the hands of larger powers. Hence my skepticism, but maybe you think we would be better off? In such a case I would be interested to know how do you think it would be the case.
I am actually in favor of a federal Eu. I just don't see it happening, because it is against the interests of some major countries.
 
I am actually in favor of a federal Eu. I just don't see it happening, because it is against the interests of some major countries.

The EU doesn't need the goodwill of the US, China or Russia. If we count on their interests to defend our own, we're already lost.
 
The Eu isn't in the thread. Are you of the view that Germany wants a federal Eu or not?

I don't understand the question as Germany is a collection of individuals having many different opinions. If you meant by that the incoming Chancellor Friedrich Merz, I would say that it's too soon to tell, but the first signals are very postive.
 
Any source for that?

Look by yourself, I won't lose my time for your service. Generally speaking, and despite their differences, European countries, including Germany with Merz, did not back down when Trump overturned the alliance on the question of Ukraine. I interpret that as a good sign. When Trump trapped Zelensky at the White House, his intention was to isolate him. That's not what happened.
 
Last edited:
Look for yourself, I won't lose my time for your service. Generally speaking, and despite their differences, European countries, including Germany with Merz, did not back down when Trump overturned the alliance on the question of Ukraine. I interpret that as a good sign. When Trump trapped Zelensky at the White House, his intention was to isolate him. That's not what happened.
There is no source, as your claim has no basis in reality (Germany wanting a federal Eu). Thanks for backing your words, though; makes discussion worth the while.
 
Last edited:
There is no source, as your claim has no basis in reality (Germany wanting a federal Eu). Thanks for backing your words, though; makes discussion worth the while.

I already told that I wasn't specifically talking about federalizing. You didn't answer to the initial question which was how could European countries fate be different from becoming pawns in the hand of larger powers if they don't join forces in a way or another. Alright then, if this is just going to be a ping pong discussion where no one listens, I’m not really interested in continuing.
 
le Pen . Some modernized fascist . Who somehow would surrender Ukraine to evil Putin even .

macron . Does not conduct Lawfare . Ever . We have been assured Europeans are above that .

people . Who talk about machines . Because this is the Matrix and they are the Zion . Or something . Yes , there is no machine behind the European Democracy and it is the will of people . Always .

the Varufakis tweet thing incidentally revolves around creating stopping power against the reported Francogerman support thing for Imamoğlu , because no machine or whatever and London goes through the motions of rejecting to support him . Democracy is for Europeans alone . Very much like the American Exceptionalism .
r16 your posts are so cryptic they often can be interpreted many different ways.
Make a statement, comrade :salute:
 
What a joke, stop acting like a drama queen. This isn’t the first time a frontrunner in a French presidential election has been prevented from running due to legal troubles. It already happened to Alain Juppé, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, and François Fillon.

The supreme irony is that, 10 years ago, Marine Le Pen was calling for lifelong ineligibility for anyone convicted of embezzlement related to their electoral mandate. See the video posted below to prove my point (English auto-captions can be generated). The National Rally will have a candidate in 2027 and she will be able to run again for the 17th time in 2032.

You don't find it remarkable that it's always the right wing parties that are 'investigated' and found guilty?
Do you honestly think that left wing parties' hands are all clean - or do you think that they don't really investigate them. Or they do, but 'find nothing wrong'?
Don't be naive. This is how they bar right wing politicians.
 
The EU has moved slowly toward federalism since its creation. Initially, the Council (made up of the relevant ministers from each country) and the Council of the EU (made up of the leaders of each country) were the governing bodies with all the power, while truly communitarian or federalist bodies, such as the Commission, were only relevant for very specific or essentially symbolic, like the Parliament. The same is true of decision-making processes: the unanimity system (or "veto power," as it is incorrectly called here) was dominant at first, while the qualified majority system applied only to specific issues.

Now, power is shared between the Council and Parliament, the Council of the EU is almost symbolic, and the Commission is, in fact, the EU's executive branch, with the ability to drive changes. The same is true of decision-making processes. Unanimity is now used only on specific issues, such as security, foreign policy, and the admission of new members, while qualified majority voting is used for everything else.

This federalization process has been stalled for several years, however, following several setbacks, especially the failed European Constitution. But now, given the current global situation, things are going to change, and quickly. It's curious how the EU's greatest enemies, Putin and Trump, are also its greatest allies.
 
You don't find it remarkable that it's always the right wing parties that are 'investigated' and found guilty?
Do you honestly think that left wing parties' hands are all clean - or do you think that they don't really investigate them. Or they do, but 'find nothing wrong'?
Don't be naive. This is how they bar right wing politicians.
Have you considered citing your claims, at any point in time?

From 2017 and 2018:
 
Back
Top Bottom