warpus
Sommerswerd asked me to change this
How big was your whole hiking group that trekked together?
It was just four of us hiking together - the three amigos and our fearless guide. Our porter was usually hiking well ahead of us, so he we almost never saw him on the trail. He did join us for the acclimatization days though; if one person fell behind a bit (like me), the guide could stay behind with the slowpoke and the porter could stay with the rest of the group and look after them. There was nothing for the porter to carry from A to B on these days, and most porters want to eventually become guides, so I suspect this is like a job shadowing sort of experience for them.
We came across two types of groups of people hiking together, for the most part. There were the large groups, made up of 10-15+ people, all hiking together. This is the situation I wanted to avoid, which is why I booked everything myself instead of going with a package deal from a travel operator. This way we paid less and got a far more personal experience. Our guide could do a much better job looking after each one of us, since there were only three of us. I feel like we established a bond with our guide that might not have been possible with a larger group.
The other kind of group we ran into on the trail were smaller groups, like ours.. usually a bit larger though, let's say 4-5 friends hiking together. Most of these groups did not opt to hire their own guide or porter, at least based on the people we talked to. But sometimes you just don't ask questions like that, so it's tough to say. Overall I would say most people go with a larger group. It's just so much easier to sign on to a website, pay, and let the company figure everything out, aside from your flight in and out of the country.
So yeah, it was just the four of us walking together for the two weeks! It made it feel like our own little expedition, which added to the experience. We (i.e. the three amigos) also had the power to alter the itinerary at any time. This was our expedition. If we felt like it we could have extended our hike and added a second alpine crossing (which we considered). We could have turned around at any time or taken an alternate route. Our guide was being paid to lead us for 2 weeks time, but our destination was up to us. We didn't end up altering the route at all, but when you're with a large group the company calls the shots. When you hire your own guide, you do.
If you're wondering what would have happened if we needed to extend our hike by let's say 2-3 days (or even longer).. Our guide would have called the airport (at the trailhead in Lukla) and rescheduled our flights for us. We would have figured out the payment for the extra days after the fact as well. The more common alternation to the hiking itinerary is to make them shorter, in which case you do not get any of your money back for the days you didn't end up hiking on.
This way we also had some options in the case of one of us coming down with a significant enough set of high altitude sickness symptoms. When that happens you are supposed to descend right away. If you're in a larger group, then you are on a schedule. If you have to descend, your trip is over, as your group will continue on without you. But if you hire your own guide like we did, you call the shots, so your whole group could then spend an extra day waiting it out with you at lower altitudes, potentially resuming the hike a day or two behind schedule. We gave ourselves enough days at the end to add on to our itinerary as needed, in case something like this ended up happening.
I don't mean to knock hiking with a larger group at all, as I had a brilliant experience doing that in Peru back in 2012. However, for this particular hike, with so many other people you come across on the trail.. IMO hiking with a small group makes a huge difference. It made it feel less like a packaged trip and more like an adventure