ybbor said:
Masquerouge said:Oh my non-existing God. We are all doomed. It's strange that one of the, if not the, most scientifically advanced nation in the planet is not able to properly educate its population![]()
JoeM said:@masquerouge
Well to be fair, most people only spend time on issues that matter to them, and that puts TV head and shoulders ahead of the nature of the universe for the majority of western civilization.
ybbor said:
OkayElrohir said:If it's so important, why don't you take it to your thread?
Ray Martinez said:Scientific Proof of the Great Flood
It appears in the sky after it rains.
Genesis 9:12
"And God said, "This is the sign of the covenant I am making between me
and you and every living creature with you, a covenant for all
generations to come: 13 I have set my RAINBOW in the clouds, and it
will be the sign of the covenant between me and the earth. 14 Whenever
I bring clouds over the earth and the RAINBOW appears in the clouds, 15
I will remember my covenant between me and you and all living creatures
of every kind. Never again will the waters become a flood to destroy
all life. 16 Whenever the RAINBOW appears in the clouds, I will see it
and remember the everlasting covenant between God and all living
creatures of every kind on the earth."
There is no reason the rainbow should appear, except that it was
created by God as a sign that He will not destroy by flood ever again.
I always said the scientific evidence for the Flood was spectacular and
could be OBSERVED by anyone.
If so, how can explain this:Ray Martinez said:There is no reason the rainbow should appear, except that it was
created by God as a sign that He will not destroy by flood ever again.
I always said the scientific evidence for the Flood was spectacular and
could be OBSERVED by anyone.
Sophie 378 said:OMG, this thread is so funny! I love watching the creationists huff and puff and try to blow our house down by speaking out of their ... hats.![]()
![]()
![]()
My personal summary would be, that if you THINK that evolution could be true, then looking at the evidence, it looks like it very probably is? But, if you FEEL that some sort of religious creation/changing of life is true, then you can ignore all of the observations that don't fit your worldview because they might make you feel uncomfortable?
You're always welcome to pick apart problems in evolutionist arguements to justify that.ybbor said:ignoring my instinctive reaction to ignore any post that begins with "OMG"...
I would say exactly the same thing to you about this thread, with the roles reveresed
I both know and think that God exists and that he created the world. I don't think you should assume that creationists just "feel" it and just go on that.Sophie 378 said:My personal summary would be, that if you THINK that evolution could be true, then looking at the evidence, it looks like it very probably is? But, if you FEEL that some sort of religious creation/changing of life is true, then you can ignore all of the observations that don't fit your worldview because they might make you feel uncomfortable?
Yes, actually you should. Especially as if there is a God and you don't believe in him he'll likely be ticked - if there isn't and you do believe in him then you've lost nothing at all.Or if you want some logic-chopping: evolution could theoretically be disproved. No-one has yet thought up an experiment to disprove god. So i'd better trot along to the nearest church?
Well, sometimes when it rains....If so, how can explain this:
It makes you feel like your intelligence is slowly draining away, but you can do it.ignoring my instinctive reaction to ignore any post that begins with "OMG" ...
No, but from my perspectie an emotional componant is apparent in creationism.Elrohir said:I both know and think that God exists and that he created the world. I don't think you should assume that creationists just "feel" it and just go on that.
But if it's the wrong god he'll be more ticked then if you didn't believe in a god at allElrohir said:Yes, actually you should. Especially as if there is a God and you don't believe in him he'll likely be ticked - if there isn't and you do believe in him then you've lost nothing at all.![]()
Well, Babbler's just demonstrating the silliness of Ray Martinez's arguement that TLC was so kind to share.Elrohir said:Well, sometimes when it rains....![]()
Yeah, Sophie 378 needs to learn a little bit more about debatin'.Elrohir said:It makes you feel like your intelligence is slowly draining away, but you can do it.![]()
Perfection said:You're always welcome to pick apart problems in evolutionist arguements to justify that.
Pascal's wager rests on assumptions no Christian should accept. To borrow a motif from the Bible, the demons would go to Heaven if it holds.Elrohir said:Yes, actually you should. Especially as if there is a God and you don't believe in him he'll likely be ticked - if there isn't and you do believe in him then you've lost nothing at all.![]()
You'd do well to point out what she's ignored.ybbor said:as I have