nonconformist
Miserable
You can be, but you can't use the term "Sir" unless you're a British citizen.
Commonwealth + IrishNot really.
We have the Gurkhas, which recruits Nepalis, and the SAS has a high degree of non-English, but since membership of the armed forces requires allegiance to the Queen (excepting the Marines), non-commonwealthers are usually forbidden.
You can be, but you can't use the term "Sir" unless you're a British citizen.
Commonwealth + Irish
We are given an exception for some reason.
I wonder if an EUian could argue that the restriction is against the free movement of people?
Afaik it is a leftover from the Free state - when we became independent most of what is now the commonwealth was empire so there were no impediments to joining the military.Interesting. Is this a recent development? If it is an allegiance thing as noncon suggests then surely recent history would bar Free Staters from joining the British Army?
In 2008 Commonwealth origin volunteers comprised approximately 6.7% of the Army's total strength. In total 6,600 foreign soldiers from 42 countries were represented in the Army, not including Gurkhas. After the Gurkhas (who are from Nepal), the nation with most citizens in the British Army is Fiji, with 2,185, followed by Jamaica and Ghana with 600 each; many soldiers also come from more prosperous countries such as New Zealand, South Africa and the Republic of Ireland.
There has been a strong and continuing tradition of recruiting from Ireland including what is now the Republic of Ireland. Almost 150,000 Irish soldiers fought in the First World War; 49,000 died. More than 60,000 Irishmen, more than from Northern Ireland, also saw action in the Second World War; like their compatriots in the Great War, all were volunteers. There were more than 400 men serving from the Republic in 2003.[19]
You know, as a kid, I always wanted to be knighted by the Queen of EnglandOh well.
You're 300 years too late. Queen Anne was the last Queen of England.
Commonwealth + Irish
We are given an exception for some reason.
I wonder if an EUian could argue that the restriction is against the free movement of people?