The Status of Abstain

Should 'abstain' votes be counted

  • Abstain votes should be counted

    Votes: 10 29.4%
  • Abstain votes should not be counted

    Votes: 21 61.8%
  • Abstain

    Votes: 3 8.8%

  • Total voters
    34
  • Poll closed .
People should have the right to abstain, if they do not approve of any of the options.

Thus, IMHO, abstain votes should not be counted.
That's cool, the poll closed yesterday and yielded your opinion as a result.
 
That's cool, the poll closed yesterday and yielded your opinion as a result.

I was just expressing my opinion after the poll. Quite a coincidence :lol:
 
So if abstain doesn't count, then doesn't that mess up the DP pool poll? What if certain people only voted abstain?
 
So if abstain doesn't count, then doesn't that mess up the DP pool poll? What if certain people only voted abstain?
If I remember correctly I did suggest to stop polls from opening or recreate polls that were currently out after this poll about the abstain status was done. We're not going into a repoll frenzy now though I hope.
 
I think this poll is effective from here on out( or until we rewrite in abstain). I suppose people could challenge the DP poll and any other with an abstain vote as invalid. BUT i hope common sense rule( trademark Daveshack) prevails and we move forward. We dont need to stop game progress due to a small polling issue like this.

/its small because even if all of the abstains voted it would only effect 1 person in the DP poll and no one else.
 
For the record: since I'm the only contender that didn't make the 60% score in the DP elections I wish to state that I will not ask for a repoll. I accept the outcome of the DP elections poll for term 1.
 
My deep respect, Hyronymus.

That is democracy.

Best regards,
Maybe it is but I don't think you should start demanding things until you know your place. Who knows how annoying I become :lol:.
 
Deleted to allow for DaveShack's action.

-- Ravensfire
 
And there are always people who vote for candidates and abstain :mischief:
 
Using abstain in multi-choise polls (like the DP poll) does not skew the shown percentages in the results so those percentages can be taken as they are listed.

In polls where only one choice can be made then we will have to manually recalculate the percentages by subtracting the abstain votes from the totals and dividing the vote total of each option by the result. My biggest agrument for counting abstain was so we wouldn't have to do this. Given the results of this poll the easiest thing to do is not use the abstain option in single choice polls. Then we can see the true vote percentages for what they are.
 
Using abstain in multi-choise polls (like the DP poll) does not skew the shown percentages in the results so those percentages can be taken as they are listed.

In polls where only one choice can be made then we will have to manually recalculate the percentages by subtracting the abstain votes from the totals and dividing the vote total of each option by the result. My biggest agrument for counting abstain was so we wouldn't have to do this. Given the results of this poll the easiest thing to do is not use the abstain option in single choice polls. Then we can see the true vote percentages for what they are.

Hypothetical situation:

Let's say there's two votes. One person votes for everyone - that's 100%. Now, a 2nd person comes along and votes only for abstain. Now everyone has 1 vote out of 2 -- that's 50%. It can skew the results. Ok, maybe not greatly in this case as there were many votes, but it can affact people who are really close to the 60% mark.
 
Well, it should affect the situation as apparently one person doesn't want the nominees as DP's, and one person does. So they have and should have 50% support in the poll.
 
Well, it should affect the situation as apparently one person doesn't want the nominees as DP's, and one person does. So they have and should have 50% support in the poll.

:agree:
but:

Abstain votes should not be counted

won - so currently we should find a way to not count abstain (which might be tricky in multiple choice polls)...
 
Just abstaining in the DP-pool poll has the same effect as voting without clicking any options (is that possible?)
 
Just don't include abstain as an option. If people don't want to vote for someone or even for noone then they don't. Easy as that.
 
You can't vote without clicking an option (I checked :D), therefor abstain should be included.
 
Just don't include abstain as an option. If people don't want to vote for someone or even for noone then they don't. Easy as that.

Not necissarily. When it came to voting it was really nice having the abstain option, as there were a few that people did vote abstain on. By having abstain it still allowed those who didn't like any candidate to have their vote count. This is what is very important, as it allowed everyone to see how many total players voted. Check the polls, total votes averaged around 37 and 38 votes. If we didn't count abstain there would be a bigger difference between the number of votes, and it would be harder to detect if someone was creating false accounts.

With abstain in the voting polls if you see that every election tends to have around x votes, but one poll has a lot more than x votes, it's easier to see that there may be a problem.

If you don't have abstain there will be a bigger difference and it'll be harder to see any false votes.
 
If abstain were labelled "None of the Above" in the DP pool vote, then it would be more clear what voters should do.

A separate single choice poll for each candidate would be the only foolproof way.
 
If abstain were labelled "None of the Above" in the DP pool vote, then it would be more clear what voters should do.

Yes, None of the Above should have been used in that instance. It appears that the poll iniator is going to have to make the decision on which to use.
 
Back
Top Bottom