The Wild Wild West: A Small Mafia Game

Gamezrule seems better target to me
 
Ok, why so?

Is there anything particularly decisive between Gamez and Olaf as suspects that makes it clear which one is a better candidate, and if so, please articulate that.
 
Well, take the truth however you like it, it doesn't change it. I was attacked.

hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. I think you and zack should confer in private over the nature of the messages you each so called received. It's possible you might have been a target of a vig, as I don't get the impression people would vig mechaerik.

But, considering that "Nobody has a personal VC." and the game is over when the mafia "equal or outnumber the town, the game is over!" there seems to be no evidence of a serial killer.

I don't particularly think you would lie about something trivial like this, but then again, who knows.
 
Ok, why so?

Is there anything particularly decisive between Gamez and Olaf as suspects that makes it clear which one is a better candidate, and if so, please articulate that.

I do not know

I just *feel* it as a better choice. I would gladly follow any better lead, if there was one
 
I think GamezRule's report of being attacked seems reasonable. The idea of a vigilante would fit in perfectly -- it's not called the wild west for nothing. However if there is one, he doesn't seem too effective, missing twice if we think Zack was attacked by the same person. I'm not so sure about that though, the NinjaCow lynch was all about a perceived flinch when he mentioned roleblocks (as only a scum would be concerned about blocking mafia) instead of a possible doctor.

I think General Olaf is a better choice right now than GamezRule. And my FoS points in the general direction of folk who were suspicious of the attacks.
 
My PM basically said something along the lines of "As you leaned forward to grab your coffee, a bullet whizzed through where your head used to be. You ran outside to meet your attacker, and all you saw was a trenchcoated figure running away from the scene."
 
It makes no sense that Gamez would say that out of the blue with no heat on him and nothing like "All vigilantes reveal to me" as mafia. So, because of that, I'll vote: Olaf.
 
It makes no sense that Gamez would say that out of the blue with no heat on him and nothing like "All vigilantes reveal to me" as mafia.[/B]

Yes.
Unvote; vote: Olaf
 
I'd have to agree.

On the other hand, Olaf doesn't seem that mafiaish. That statement about the night 2 kills makes me think he wasn't paying enough attention to notice that Zack claimed he'd been attacked, in which case, he's far more likely to be innocent than mafia.
 
GamezRule, did your PM from Verarde specifically note that you were attacked? If not, it wasn't an attack. Perhaps you were roleblocked, or something to that effect?
 
well I'd say if it did specify bullet that specifies an attack.

anyways, seems zack and gamezrule's attack PMs are consistent with how people are dying. Every dead body has been found in their own "house", not some type of gun show-down or something like that.

Though I'm also not inclined to think being attacked means innocence. It depends on how many more night kills/attacks we get, but I could easily see mafia escaping vig's. Sheriff wants to take someone out at OK corral? The rustlers can run away.

Since no night kill happened night 2, I'd assume zack was attacked by the mafia.
 
I am still trying to puzzle through the attack on gamezrule, if it in fact matches zack's then it seems reasonable to assume the same thing was done to them.

The problem with this is that when zack was attacked there was no kill, and when gamezrule there was.

Which either means that this is not a kill and they failed against someone else on night 2 or that there are in fact 2 kills and they just have never happened to succeed on the same night. This seems unlikely, especially in this small a game.

Anyway I am rambling analysis, my conclusion is that this is not a kill or that gamezrule is lying, and if it is not a kill why did zack's attack correspond with no kill. Gamezrule I would like to know if your attack really matches with zack's
 
@j65536d: Any particular reason you always vote for me?
 
@gamezrule, in both cases because you seem scummier than the others. Yesterday I was not a fan of the ninjacow bandwagon, and today, you have claims of an attack, despite the previous nights suggesting only one attack.

General Olaf looks confused, gamezrule is making quite a claim (2 attacks in the same night) and of the two bandwagons seems the better pick
 
CivGeneral, sitting on the couch in Town Hall and hearing people discuss the killer. "Somehow, I believe that General Olaf is the culprit in the whole ordeal".
 
Back
Top Bottom