I realy found the ending of AI to be rather pathetic, along with the rest of the film. Though I'm sure it has worth some people who enjoy the emotional aspects of the film, I'm not one of them.Bozo Erectus said:I thought the ending was perfect. But the ending probably played a part in it bombing and being quickly forgotten. It wasnt the type of ending American audiences are used to, especially in this sort of fim.
I sincerely like all those old films I commented on and love talking about. I find they have a certain gravity that modern day films generally lack. These 'oldies' were also subject to far less of the heavy commercial pressure we find in cinema today. For this reason in the mainpart the oldies are demonstrations of far greater artistic freedom, therefore achieving more satisfying creative levels. Just my little word for the oldiesrbis4rbb said:I think they're trying to be artsy, just by pciking obscure, old, foreing language films. Like "Hah! I watched YiHGfhNBO and enjoyed it! I'm culturally enriched!"
Speilbergs AI would be on my list. One of the most overlooked movies ever. I think its the best film Speilberg ever made.
First script drafts were written by Stanley Kubrick. The film is an absolute balls up because Kubrick was one of the most seeringly intellectual filmmakers ever to grace western screens (and a f***ing good photographic brain at that) - whereas Spielberg is a slushy idiot.FriendlyFire said:WTH ?
Thats cause two directors worked on it. I forget the orginal director but spilberg ended up taking over and completing the project when the orginal director died. And I though it was just a mess.
Rambuchan said:...Kubrick was one of the most seeringly intellectual filmmakers ever to grace western screens (and a f***ing good photographic brain at that)
I disagree. There is an almost Zen quality to that film, which I find makes it a good and original film/experience. He achieves it again in Space Odessey (can never spell that word) and also in Eyes Wide Shut. Tarkofvski does it in Solaris also. You get it in Being There also. There's an emptiness or illusion and that's the point and it wouldn't be making the point if it followed any other pattern. I appreciate some find that a bit lame but I'm a sucker for this guy's films. He's the dog's nuts of them all in my book.The Fjonis said:I never understood why so many people are fascinated by Barry Lyndon. The film is about --- nothing at all. I know this is exactly the point (showing how pointless our lives are, underlined by the line at the end; "but in the end, it didn't matter at all" or something like that), but it doesn't make a very good film. There are so many much better and more refined ways of communicating that message...
Why? I mean, I'm really asking - not flaming. I simply fail to see anything that makes this one more than a well-played drama, and yet it gets glorified by US critics/imdb voters.Shawshank Redemption (This should be No 1)
superisis said:Am I correct to spot that there are no Ingmar Bergman titles on the list?