Maybe some of you who know more about cycling could tell me does Cadel Evans have a chance ? Or are these late nights spent watching going to be wasted .
Pelaton is now one of my favourite words .
Yesterday, the Belgian television made a poll asking the viewers who was their favourite for the win. 35% answered Andy Schleck, 34% voted for Evans... Lots of people believe Evans has the most chance to win the Tour this year. Mostly because he looked strong in the uphill finishes in the first week, because he didn't crash and because he seems more relaxed than in past years (stress has always been a problem for him).
I, however, am convinced he won't win the Tour
I think people are looking too much in those hilly stages. They suit him more than Schleck or Contador. It was not a big surprise to see him win in Mûr-de-Bretagne. It doesn't mean he will dominate the mountains.
I've never seen him beat either Schleck or Contador in the mountains in any major race. I don't see how he would this year. He is better in time trials than Schleck, but then again, there's only one TT in this year's Tour de France. It's the penultimate stage. Recovery plays an important role that late in the race. If Schleck recovers well from the mountains, he might not lose too much time.
Overall, the biggest reason why I think he will never win the Tour is because Evans is part of a generation of riders (like Sastre, Menchov, Leipheimer,...) who only got to the top after Ullrich, Basso and Mancebo got caught in 2006. The used to play second fiddle before and never got to the same level as their predecessors afterwards. They were just there to fill up a void after Operación Puerto. They had a shot to win the Tour in 2006 and 2008. Sastre and
LandisPereiro took them. Fat chance for the other ones
Contador and Schleck have more talent imho.
Sorry for the pessimistic post, but that's my honest opinion. I may be completely wrong though, so keep watching the race