Kennigit
proud 2 boxer
ehh. newyn isn't hat guy at the very least.
I'm not liking this. Lohrenswald is one of the only people actually trying to do some analysis right now, and I don't really see a townie angle from which this post could possibly come.
Vote:Newyn
ehh. newyn isn't hat guy at the very least.
Been a while since I played a game you were scum. So I'm afraid I don't remember. Give me a ring in private why don't you.Snerk, have you ever known me to take the easy way out when I roll a scum role?
Even once, since 2008?
Well my offer of sharing roles was indeed intended for everyone. So what's up?nah, we just have to awake the atpg kraken and he'll start flipping out and making fun wall texts and such (non indicative of alignment)
he's not going to flinch for a bit of time even if he was scum. A bunch of hot air has to be blown out of the pizza oven before you can taste the pizza in the first place. E.g. he already xplicitly ignored his own statement and did not vote for csargo.
Let things bake for a little bit lohr.
I'll just vote: snerk because as your teacher probably taught you as a youngling, if you bring something to the table, you need to share with everyone!
D2 reasoning is suppose to be shady logic. I say it's a lot more shady to not provide your own shady reasoning for a vote.What analysis? All I've seen so far from Lohrenswald is two attempts to try to get atpg lynched based on some very shody logic.
D2 reasoning is suppose to be shady logic. I say it's a lot more shady to not provide your own shady reasoning for a vote.
Fair enough!Except he didn't even provide the shody logic until there were votes on him and even then, it was just to parrot your reasoning.
.
I also need no such blatant excuse to lynch townies when I'm mafia. I put a little bit more creativity behind it than that.
One thing I am not, is a boring mafioso, or one that is predictable.
ehh. newyn isn't hat guy at the very least.
Whatever reason do you two have to say that? Why should I trust you?I can vouch that Kennigit isn't hat guy either and I personally believe he's almost certainly town.
What analysis? All I've seen so far from Lohrenswald is two attempts to try to get atpg lynched based on some very shody logic.
You calling my logic shody isn't helping much. I don't see any reason you should call it that.Except he didn't even provide the shody logic until there were votes on him and even then, it was just to parrot your reasoning.
I'm also prepared to share my role with anyone who shares their role with me. Alternatively, you can target me with whatever ability you have and you'll know exactly what I do [emoji14]
This sounds like a kind of cover. Say that you aren't killed, and you excuse that with having sent this warning, but the real reason you aren't killed is because you are mafia.I'd also like to put out a disclaimer that anyone thinking of using harmful abilities on me will not like the results of what my ability does![]()
Whatever reason do you two have to say that? Why should I trust you?
You calling my logic shody isn't helping much. I don't see any reason you should call it that.
You just said you voted for me because you wanted to keep Askthepizzaguy alive. I've seen this a couple of times, but unlike you they've given as reason that they like the other player, which really is a poor reason anyway.
This sounds like a kind of cover. Say that you aren't killed, and you excuse that with having sent this warning, but the real reason you aren't killed is because you are mafia.
I am a bit suspicions of Snerk, who fooled me last game and seems like he could be rolefishing. However, it's not that big a lead, and I doubt he would be made mafia two games in a row (sure, you never know, but still)
On a much less serious note, it's weird for anyone to compliment my playing. But I think I agree with Landlubber. I still lean on Askthepizzaguy being mafia, but vote: Newyn seems more suspicious now.
And to end this post: While I didn't give my reason to vote for Askthepizzaguy until after Snerk had done it, you can see I quoted Ask's post when I voted against him day 1, which I think quite clearly shows I came up with this idea myself.
Also, I have never, and will never, be persuaded by the this-is-not-my-playstyle-when-mafia argument..
I also need no such blatant excuse to lynch townies when I'm mafia. I put a little bit more creativity behind it than that.
One thing I am not, is a boring mafioso, or one that is predictable.
You are both saying the other isn't hat man without giving any explanation. You really don't understand why you should share why you think Kennigit isn't mafia?What reason do Kennigit and I have to vouch that neither of us can't be hat guy if that isn't true this early on day 2?
You call his vote against me "high caliber"?ATPG has repeatedly proven how good he is, I make it my policy to never kill players of his caliber this early without an extremely good reason. If he's not mafia, I fully expect the mafia to be forced into killing him eventually. Besides, he's always a great source of entertainment and these games can get boring sometimes.
So you suspect Snerk, ATPG, Kennigit and myself so far. How long before you also suddenly suspect landlubber and any other player who decides to post? [emoji14]
You are both saying the other isn't hat man without giving any explanation. You really don't understand why you should share why you think Kennigit isn't mafia?
You call his vote against me "high caliber"?
I am suspicious of everyone, because nobody has given me any reason to think they aren't mafia. But not everyone are equally suspicious. Currently, you are the one who is most so
I also disapprove of everyone who voted to lynch Choxorn.
If you need a replacement I'll give you a hand.
And to end this post: While I didn't give my reason to vote for Askthepizzaguy until after Snerk had done it, you can see I quoted Ask's post when I voted against him day 1, which I think quite clearly shows I came up with this idea myself.
I also disapprove of everyone who voted to lynch Choxorn.
Except he didn't even provide the shody logic until there were votes on him and even then, it was just to parrot your reasoning.
And to end this post: While I didn't give my reason to vote for Askthepizzaguy until after Snerk had done it, you can see I quoted Ask's post when I voted against him day 1, which I think quite clearly shows I came up with this idea myself.
Depend what you think new entailsAre you new at this game?
I admit I did gloss over this in your response to Snerk:I've already dropped plenty of hints on my power, why should I explain it completely and make it easy for the mafia? It doesn't take a genius to work out how Kennigit and I know that the other person can't be hat guy with just the information in thread.
So trying to think about it, I have two ideas as to what it could be, given what you have saidI'm also prepared to share my role with anyone who shares their role with me. Alternatively, you can target me with whatever ability you have and you'll know exactly what I do![]()
I did not try to "start a band wagon". I merely voted for the person I found most likely to be mafia. There was no reason to vote for anyone else (like Choxorn).I consider him to be one of the best players I've ever played with or against and I've been playing for a very long time. His vote for you is exactly where I expected him to vote after you've blatantly tried to start a wagon against him two days in a row based on the flimsiest of reasons.
I am not going overboard, but none of the people who hasn't posted has given me more reason to think they are mafia than you have on yourself.There's nothing wrong with suspecting people but you're going overboard with your tunnelvision accusations of the active players only while completely ignoring all the lurkers that havn't posted yet.
Eh? Even if this would clearly show you came up with the idea yourself, the overall post seemed more like agreement anyway.
[link]
Why so?
I'm going to Vote: Lohrenswald for now. Their posts seem off to me.
Also
It doesn't quite clearly show anything. In fact, the post itself says you agreed with Snerk so whether you did think of this or not it doesn't look so from the outside. This is also quite irrelevant to the fact this reasoning was only provided after you were tied for lead for lynch at ATPG 2 and you 2.
I was going to not vote because there's nothing to base anything on on the first day, but since you ask so nicely I'll vote: Askthepizzaguy
Also, I have never, and will never, be persuaded by the this-is-not-my-playstyle-when-mafia argument.
I'm not liking this. Lohrenswald is one of the only people actually trying to do some analysis right now, and I don't really see a townie angle from which this post could possibly come.
Vote:Newyn
And in this game, lynching you might yield a dead scum. But let's try to approach this from a different angle.I'd like to remind people that in This is Madness it was lynching me for vague reasons that was the final blow against any possibility for town victory