Town of Sissy Heroes - game thread

I'm not liking this. Lohrenswald is one of the only people actually trying to do some analysis right now, and I don't really see a townie angle from which this post could possibly come.
Vote:Newyn

What analysis? All I've seen so far from Lohrenswald is two attempts to try to get atpg lynched based on some very shody logic.
 
Snerk, have you ever known me to take the easy way out when I roll a scum role?

Even once, since 2008?
Been a while since I played a game you were scum. So I'm afraid I don't remember. Give me a ring in private why don't you.
nah, we just have to awake the atpg kraken and he'll start flipping out and making fun wall texts and such (non indicative of alignment)

he's not going to flinch for a bit of time even if he was scum. A bunch of hot air has to be blown out of the pizza oven before you can taste the pizza in the first place. E.g. he already xplicitly ignored his own statement and did not vote for csargo.

Let things bake for a little bit lohr.

I'll just vote: snerk because as your teacher probably taught you as a youngling, if you bring something to the table, you need to share with everyone!
Well my offer of sharing roles was indeed intended for everyone. So what's up?
What analysis? All I've seen so far from Lohrenswald is two attempts to try to get atpg lynched based on some very shody logic.
D2 reasoning is suppose to be shady logic. I say it's a lot more shady to not provide your own shady reasoning for a vote.
 
D2 reasoning is suppose to be shady logic. I say it's a lot more shady to not provide your own shady reasoning for a vote.

Except he didn't even provide the shody logic until there were votes on him and even then, it was just to parrot your reasoning.

I'm also prepared to share my role with anyone who shares their role with me. Alternatively, you can target me with whatever ability you have and you'll know exactly what I do :p
 
I'd also like to put out a disclaimer that anyone thinking of using harmful abilities on me will not like the results of what my ability does :mischief:
 
.

I also need no such blatant excuse to lynch townies when I'm mafia. I put a little bit more creativity behind it than that.

One thing I am not, is a boring mafioso, or one that is predictable.
:rolleyes:
This does not convince me
ehh. newyn isn't hat guy at the very least.

I can vouch that Kennigit isn't hat guy either and I personally believe he's almost certainly town.
Whatever reason do you two have to say that? Why should I trust you?
What analysis? All I've seen so far from Lohrenswald is two attempts to try to get atpg lynched based on some very shody logic.

Except he didn't even provide the shody logic until there were votes on him and even then, it was just to parrot your reasoning.

I'm also prepared to share my role with anyone who shares their role with me. Alternatively, you can target me with whatever ability you have and you'll know exactly what I do [emoji14]
You calling my logic shody isn't helping much. I don't see any reason you should call it that.
You just said you voted for me because you wanted to keep Askthepizzaguy alive. I've seen this a couple of times, but unlike you they've given as reason that they like the other player, which really is a poor reason anyway.
I'd also like to put out a disclaimer that anyone thinking of using harmful abilities on me will not like the results of what my ability does :mischief:
This sounds like a kind of cover. Say that you aren't killed, and you excuse that with having sent this warning, but the real reason you aren't killed is because you are mafia.

I am a bit suspicions of Snerk, who fooled me last game and seems like he could be rolefishing. However, it's not that big a lead, and I doubt he would be made mafia two games in a row (sure, you never know, but still)

On a much less serious note, it's weird for anyone to compliment my playing. But I think I agree with Landlubber. I still lean on Askthepizzaguy being mafia, but vote: Newyn seems more suspicious now.

And to end this post: While I didn't give my reason to vote for Askthepizzaguy until after Snerk had done it, you can see I quoted Ask's post when I voted against him day 1, which I think quite clearly shows I came up with this idea myself.
 
Whatever reason do you two have to say that? Why should I trust you?

What reason do Kennigit and I have to vouch that neither of us can't be hat guy if that isn't true this early on day 2?

You calling my logic shody isn't helping much. I don't see any reason you should call it that.
You just said you voted for me because you wanted to keep Askthepizzaguy alive. I've seen this a couple of times, but unlike you they've given as reason that they like the other player, which really is a poor reason anyway.

ATPG has repeatedly proven how good he is, I make it my policy to never kill players of his caliber this early without an extremely good reason. If he's not mafia, I fully expect the mafia to be forced into killing him eventually. Besides, he's always a great source of entertainment and these games can get boring sometimes.

This sounds like a kind of cover. Say that you aren't killed, and you excuse that with having sent this warning, but the real reason you aren't killed is because you are mafia.

I am a bit suspicions of Snerk, who fooled me last game and seems like he could be rolefishing. However, it's not that big a lead, and I doubt he would be made mafia two games in a row (sure, you never know, but still)

On a much less serious note, it's weird for anyone to compliment my playing. But I think I agree with Landlubber. I still lean on Askthepizzaguy being mafia, but vote: Newyn seems more suspicious now.

And to end this post: While I didn't give my reason to vote for Askthepizzaguy until after Snerk had done it, you can see I quoted Ask's post when I voted against him day 1, which I think quite clearly shows I came up with this idea myself.

So you suspect Snerk, ATPG, Kennigit and myself so far. How long before you also suddenly suspect landlubber and any other player who decides to post? :p
 
.

I also need no such blatant excuse to lynch townies when I'm mafia. I put a little bit more creativity behind it than that.

One thing I am not, is a boring mafioso, or one that is predictable.
Also, I have never, and will never, be persuaded by the this-is-not-my-playstyle-when-mafia argument.
 
What reason do Kennigit and I have to vouch that neither of us can't be hat guy if that isn't true this early on day 2?
You are both saying the other isn't hat man without giving any explanation. You really don't understand why you should share why you think Kennigit isn't mafia?

ATPG has repeatedly proven how good he is, I make it my policy to never kill players of his caliber this early without an extremely good reason. If he's not mafia, I fully expect the mafia to be forced into killing him eventually. Besides, he's always a great source of entertainment and these games can get boring sometimes.
You call his vote against me "high caliber"?

So you suspect Snerk, ATPG, Kennigit and myself so far. How long before you also suddenly suspect landlubber and any other player who decides to post? [emoji14]

I am suspicious of everyone, because nobody has given me any reason to think they aren't mafia. But not everyone are equally suspicious. Currently, you are the one who is most so

I also disapprove of everyone who voted to lynch Choxorn.
 
You are both saying the other isn't hat man without giving any explanation. You really don't understand why you should share why you think Kennigit isn't mafia?

Are you new at this game? I've already dropped plenty of hints on my power, why should I explain it completely and make it easy for the mafia? It doesn't take a genius to work out how Kennigit and I know that the other person can't be hat guy with just the information in thread.

You call his vote against me "high caliber"?

I consider him to be one of the best players I've ever played with or against and I've been playing for a very long time. His vote for you is exactly where I expected him to vote after you've blatantly tried to start a wagon against him two days in a row based on the flimsiest of reasons.

I am suspicious of everyone, because nobody has given me any reason to think they aren't mafia. But not everyone are equally suspicious. Currently, you are the one who is most so

I also disapprove of everyone who voted to lynch Choxorn.

There's nothing wrong with suspecting people but you're going overboard with your tunnelvision accusations of the active players only while completely ignoring all the lurkers that havn't posted yet.
 
If you need a replacement I'll give you a hand.

I'll put you as second on my list, thank you

after checking, there is only one person now who will be replaced at the end of day if not voting (Csargo)
 
current tally (I think):

Lohrenswald (2): Newyn, ATPG
Newyn (2): Landlubber, Lohrenswald
ATPG: Snerk
 
And to end this post: While I didn't give my reason to vote for Askthepizzaguy until after Snerk had done it, you can see I quoted Ask's post when I voted against him day 1, which I think quite clearly shows I came up with this idea myself.

Eh? Even if this would clearly show you came up with the idea yourself, the overall post seemed more like agreement anyway.
[link]

I also disapprove of everyone who voted to lynch Choxorn.

Why so?

I'm going to Vote: Lohrenswald for now. Their posts seem off to me.

Also

Except he didn't even provide the shody logic until there were votes on him and even then, it was just to parrot your reasoning.
And to end this post: While I didn't give my reason to vote for Askthepizzaguy until after Snerk had done it, you can see I quoted Ask's post when I voted against him day 1, which I think quite clearly shows I came up with this idea myself.

It doesn't quite clearly show anything. In fact, the post itself says you agreed with Snerk so whether you did think of this or not it doesn't look so from the outside. This is also quite irrelevant to the fact this reasoning was only provided after you were tied for lead for lynch at ATPG 2 and you 2.
 
Are you new at this game?
Depend what you think new entails
I've already dropped plenty of hints on my power, why should I explain it completely and make it easy for the mafia? It doesn't take a genius to work out how Kennigit and I know that the other person can't be hat guy with just the information in thread.
I admit I did gloss over this in your response to Snerk:
I'm also prepared to share my role with anyone who shares their role with me. Alternatively, you can target me with whatever ability you have and you'll know exactly what I do :p
So trying to think about it, I have two ideas as to what it could be, given what you have said
1)The action of the person who targets you is directed back at them
2)Targeting you means both you and the one targeting you know eachother's identity on the character list

The problem with 1) is that it seems way too powerful of an ability to be in any game, especially this one, where town's abilities are meant to suck.

There's two problems with 2). Firstly, as far as I know, you both have concluded the other isn't the hat man because you got the message that the other one has some other identity. But the hat man is not one of the identities Jarrema has listed, and isn't what is going to show up.
Secondly, and more importantly: It makes no sense as to why the mafia shouldn't kill you. Sure you might find out who they are, but you are going to get killed.

There's also the issue that like spaceman, it's not certain you can use your ability every night

I don't see how this is holding water
I consider him to be one of the best players I've ever played with or against and I've been playing for a very long time. His vote for you is exactly where I expected him to vote after you've blatantly tried to start a wagon against him two days in a row based on the flimsiest of reasons.
I did not try to "start a band wagon". I merely voted for the person I found most likely to be mafia. There was no reason to vote for anyone else (like Choxorn).
I don't see how this play is all that elevated over the omgus-ing that is so looked down upon (It's true I've done the same, but I feel I have explained my reasons better than Askthepizzaguy has).

There's nothing wrong with suspecting people but you're going overboard with your tunnelvision accusations of the active players only while completely ignoring all the lurkers that havn't posted yet.
I am not going overboard, but none of the people who hasn't posted has given me more reason to think they are mafia than you have on yourself.
Eh? Even if this would clearly show you came up with the idea yourself, the overall post seemed more like agreement anyway.
[link]

Why so?

I'm going to Vote: Lohrenswald for now. Their posts seem off to me.

Also

It doesn't quite clearly show anything. In fact, the post itself says you agreed with Snerk so whether you did think of this or not it doesn't look so from the outside. This is also quite irrelevant to the fact this reasoning was only provided after you were tied for lead for lynch at ATPG 2 and you 2.

Firstly, I was reffering to the post I made on day one that you can see here, not my explanation on day 2. I was the first person to vote against Askthepizzaguy for an implied reason. I didn't spell it right out before Snerk did this day, though

I was going to not vote because there's nothing to base anything on on the first day, but since you ask so nicely I'll vote: Askthepizzaguy

Secondly, I explained day 1 why doing random voting and hoping to get a mafia by luck was a bad idea. And lo and behold I was right.

Thirdly: note that you, Xym, said that "Their posts seem off to me" in None Shall Pass 3 as well, and you know I was a town member in that game.
I also don't see what you think is so off about my posts, I'd like to hear more why you think so.

I'd like to remind people that in This is Madness it was lynching me for vague reasons that was the final blow against any possibility for town victory
 
Also, I have never, and will never, be persuaded by the this-is-not-my-playstyle-when-mafia argument.

Whether it persuades you or not, it is the truth and will continue to be after this game has concluded.
 
I'm not liking this. Lohrenswald is one of the only people actually trying to do some analysis right now, and I don't really see a townie angle from which this post could possibly come.
Vote:Newyn

^This post seems to be exaggerated, to put it charitably. Especially the underlined.
 
I'd like to remind people that in This is Madness it was lynching me for vague reasons that was the final blow against any possibility for town victory
And in this game, lynching you might yield a dead scum. But let's try to approach this from a different angle.

Assume I'm town and assume you're town for the sake of discussion.

I'm not following where your suspicion of people comes from. Why do you disapprove of everyone who voted to lynch choxorn? You're suspicious of me, Newyn, Snerk. You're suspicious of the choxorn voters. That's six suspects.

You're kind of all over the place. Which, by the way, is probably the towniest aspect of your play thus far. But, I think you're not accurate. Let's see if we can refocus your shotgun in the appropriate direction.

Or, to put it another way:

Colors: Your apparent leans
Spoiler :
Choxorn (3): KingMorgan, Kennigit, Remake
ATPG (2): Landlubber, Lohrenswald
Cuthillius (2): Spaceman, Xym
Landlubber: Al Sipsclar
Remake: Choxorn
KingMorgan: ATPG
Kennigit: MartinLuther
Newyn: Snerk
Snerk: Cuthillius
[The game host]: Newyn
The people in red are the ones you suspect more than average.

I don't think you're hitting home with most of these accusations. Of the people you suspect, I am less than thrilled with the suspicions on:

1) Kennigit (His and Newyn's posts)
2) Newyn (His and Kennigit's posts)
3) Askthepizzaguy (Swing and a miss!)


Stuff we might agree on:

A) Kingmorgan (I voted him day one, he's done nothing so far this game except the D1 vote.)
B) Remake20 (Because he's lurking and not posting, that indicates a lack of town solving)

Snerk maybe but my gut says no. He reads the appropriate level of paranoia.

So, I would recommend we lynch Remake20 instead, since he will dodge the WOG today.

Or, a compromise, if you like:

How about Xym or Cuthilius? Xym is trying to lynch you, third on the wagon. But if someone scummy like remake20 was voting to spare Cuthilius day one, that would explain much.

The OMGUS is a powerful scum-hunting weapon.

But I do not believe that remake20's vote on choxorn was true OMGUS. It was third on the wagon and deliberately lynches choxorn and saves me and Cuthilius, who had two votes apiece.

I know that choxorn AND Askthepizzaguy were both townies. Therefore, if Cuthilius is a scumbag, that means something. It would also mean that Xym is probably a townie in those circumstances.

_____________






The most suspicious person in the game right now is remake20, but Cuthilius is an interesting alternative.

I urge votes to move there.



Unvote,

Vote: Remake20
 
Back
Top Bottom