Turn 145 - 290 AD

[rcoutme]

btw, If we had a settler with our galleys and burned Fortaleeza after moving into the lake with a settler, they would be forced to build a city (and then move a fleet there) where Fortaleeza was in order to capture our last settler. This would follow the 'dishonorable' course but would be a fun way to frustrate the buggers until they figured out what to do...If there are two people left in Fortaleeza, you could disband units (especially galleys) to obtain sufficient shields to follow this program :suicide: This will be the last suggestions of the CoMA as I will do a banzai charge at Fortaleeza and do not expect to survive...you will then have to replace me with someone else I guess, as dead men tell no tales.

 

[Donovan Zoi]

btw, If we had a settler with our galleys and burned Fortaleeza after moving into the lake with a settler, they would be forced to build a city (and then move a fleet there) where Fortaleeza was in order to capture our last settler. This would follow the 'dishonorable' course but would be a fun way to frustrate the buggers until they figured out what to do...If there are two people left in Fortaleeza, you could disband units (especially galleys) to obtain sufficient shields to follow this program :suicide: This will be the last suggestions of the CoMA as I will do a banzai charge at Fortaleeza and do not expect to survive...you will then have to replace me with someone else I guess, as dead men tell no tales.

What an awesome idea!

Especially if we were to protect that ship with 8-10 remaining Galleys. The raid would need to be done by C3B only, or else our enemy would tread some risky city-trading laws at the UN to get the CGN Caravels in there. Priceless!

 

[Provolution]

Guess who came up with the basics

 

[RegentMan]

btw, If we had a settler with our galleys and burned Fortaleeza after moving into the lake with a settler, they would be forced to build a city (and then move a fleet there) where Fortaleeza was in order to capture our last settler. This would follow the 'dishonorable' course but would be a fun way to frustrate the buggers until they figured out what to do...If there are two people left in Fortaleeza, you could disband units (especially galleys) to obtain sufficient shields to follow this program :suicide:

I finally figured out what your plan is about, and it is hilarious! However, I'm not too sure that we want to do this. I don't want CFC to be put into the same category as GCA.

 

[Provolution]

Do it Do it Do it

 

[Rik Meleet]

1 problem (if the admins rule that we can continue ...)
We need to withstand the counterattack by C3B forces in order to have our settler build. I'm kinda willing to do this plan as it gives CDZ, C3B and CGN an idea on how we (or at least I) feel betrayed.
CDZ: for stating they wanted to stay out of any C3B-CFC conflict. Betrayel rate 1 out of 5.
CGN: for planning an invasion prior to meeting us and not being brave enough to say that CFC has no possibilities in making friends with CGN. Betrayel rate 2 out of 5.
C3B: for not wanting an alliance at all, for lying to us about the horses and their north, for 1 sided cancelling deals, etc. Betrayel rate 6 out of 5.

It needs to be polled though. Can someone please make a poll ?

 

[Provolution]

Do them in, do them in do them in do them in

Lakers Lakers Lakers Lakers, Ricky Lake. Go Fortaleza to the lake and BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN BABY, BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN

I am all for squatting in that pond.

 

[Rik Meleet]

Poll is here.

 

[akots]

... I'm kinda willing to do this plan as it gives CDZ, C3B and CGN an idea on how we (or at least I) feel betrayed.
CDZ: for stating they wanted to stay out of any C3B-CFC conflict. Betrayel rate 1 out of 5.
CGN: for planning an invasion prior to meeting us and not being brave enough to say that CFC has no possibilities in making friends with CGN. Betrayel rate 2 out of 5.
C3B: for not wanting an alliance at all, for lying to us about the horses and their north, for 1 sided cancelling deals, etc. Betrayel rate 6 out of 5. ...

Please don't feel ... betrayed. It has nothing to do with betrayal. Neither of these teams have violated any treaties or any obligations or promises they gave to us officially. Lied they did sometimes and evaded issues which were put straight but it is like it is and we just have to live with it.

Don't pay too much attention to the UN discussion as well. It might be that some of the other team members feel miserable about all this drama, you never know.

Accept the loss but fight to the end. It is not over until it is over.

 

[akots]

@Rik: Oh, and play the turns please. Either retire or play. You are the elected turnplayer. If you cannot play for a relatively long time (which is 3 turns missed recently already), this basically means chaos. Not that it really matters. I have told the same things to DZ and Cheetah and repeating the same to you.