No snow is wonderful!!! I couldn't live in a place without snow. Gee this thread has become large very fast.Zwelgje said:Snow can be a true pain indeed.
aaglo said:Some people doesn't seem to understand, that a bicycle helmet may just well be a very cheap insurance. You really can take a tumble because of various reasons not caused directly by yourself:
- other bicyclists
- pedestrians
- cars
- something breaks badly on your bike when you're going 30 mph downhill
shadow2k said:I haven't fallen off my bike since I was seven, what do I need a helmet for?
I don't even wear a motorcycle helmet. The only reason I own one is for passengers, or if I have to drive into Missouri where it's the law. I wrecked my 2nd motorcycle because of a helmet. I couldn't see the crazy old lady coming into my lane and running me off the highway at 75mph, because the helmet blocked my peripheral vision.
I hate the things. They're dangerous.
shadow2k said:I don't even wear a motorcycle helmet. The only reason I own one is for passengers, or if I have to drive into Missouri where it's the law. I wrecked my 2nd motorcycle because of a helmet. I couldn't see the crazy old lady coming into my lane and running me off the highway at 75mph, because the helmet blocked my peripheral vision.
I hate the things. They're dangerous.
Sidhe said:Most people have insurance measures that never get realised, seat belts, anti lock breaks, chasis cages. You may lie on a pavement your brains leaking from your head and wonder what exactly is the problem with cycle helmets at some point, you may not? Motrocycle helmets use is law in the UK, I don't see motorcyclists complaining.
good one. man people are posting here like crazy.EolTheDarkElf said:I use the helmet whenever I manage not to forget it.
If I look stupid to people, it's their problem, definitely not mine.
AL_DA_GREAT said:just becuase you are wearing a helmet doesn't mean you are living in fear.
shadow2k said:But they are worn to combat the fear of what would occur in a wreck if you didn't wear it.
EolTheDarkElf said:I would disagree and say they are worn to combat the effects of the wreck.
Fear is when you refuse to ride your bike just because you don't/can't have a helmet (for whatever reason).
On the other hand I agree that there should be no such laws. Each man should have the right to crack their skull open as they please. However, the issue gets a little touchy when tax-funded health care enters the picture. I would propose a much simpler law - if you crack your shull open on a bike while wearing no helmet that's all fine and dandy, only you have to pay for your treatment yourself