User reviews at GameSpot

[Thunderfall]

There are lots of bad player reviews of Civ3 at GameSpot:

http://gamespot.com/gamespot/filters/products/readers/0,11103,454261,00.html

On the other hand, the user reviews for Civ2 are mostly positive:

http://gamespot.com/gamespot/filters/products/readers/0,11103,196926,00.html

 

[Klash]

the wide range of reviews are amazing, there are very high and very low reviews. I am guessing most of the bad reviews are from people who made CivIII their first Civ game.

 

[strollen]

You know it took me 20-25 hours to finish my first game. I lot of looking at the manuals, and few reloads . I don't understand how somebody could review the game on Oct 31 as so many people did. I guess an hour is enough to make you an expert .

 

[Klash]

I have had a game going for 3 days now and I'm not even in the 1900s (although I dont play for long periods)

 

[=AA=Aussie]

god, look at this moron

http://gamespot.com/gamespot/stories/readers/0,10986,642813,00.html

he wrote a review, completly missed the POINT of CivIII, and then PLUGED A COMPLETLY DIFFERENT GAME!

 

[Poochface]

LOL, that guy in the link spends half his review plugging EE websites.

 

[Becka]

I wonder, just WONDER if he ACTUALLY played the game. I think he just looked at the screen shots and got info from reviews.

 

[droo]

Obviously he was there to pimp EE, nothing more to it.

 

[TrailblazingScot]

He gave civ3 a 1.6 but said it deserved a 7.5...one ****ed up

there...

Bet he was American...sorry, sorry, sorry!

:crazyeyes