Am i missing something or is this your argument ( blue3c)?you start out by telling us that Civ4 is more of a beta game than a finished one and that all in all it is a bad unfinished game, and they tricked you into buying the game ( beta), and end by telling us to boycott it.
Firstly i want to start out saying that i love your argument technique, that is,you seem to skip a pivitol part of the argument, telling us why its unfinished. I and apprently many others think it is a great game, but thats not imporant.
your saying that we should boycott this game not only becuase it is unfinished, but because they trick us into buying it
" Paying top dollar, at release, only to be suckered into a rushed to production unfinished game"
did they make you buy the game? no. Did they somehow mislead you in any way? no. Did you ahve to buy the game before wating to see what other people think about to guage weather its worth your money? no. as you yourself said you bought the game without knowing what it is
" I am sure you read Sid and said this game will rock no matter what."
so you bought the game based on brand loyalty ( perhaps the worst type of loyalty). Finished or unfinished they have a right to release their game in any stage of development, and they have a right to think they have a good product, it is up to the consumer ( thats you and me) to be able to wisly choose what to buy ( based on forums shuch as this wiht people who rate the game, and based on review sites, that all gave civ4 a great score).
lastly you say that sid owes us a apology and that anyhtign else is a " slap in the face". I got a little lost here. Even if we all agree that the game sucks and is otaly unfinished and buggy, why should they aplogize to us? have they dont anything wrong? did they make the game bad just to spite us, just to make our lives worse? no, they for varous reasons, from lazyness to senility or stupidity ( for the sake of argument, becuase i think its a great game) made a sub-standerd game, but they didnt market to any person individually, but instead but it on a rack and marketed to the world " buy our game". Thats not something you apologize for. If they or the box specificly told you to buy the game becuase you wont regret it ( when i first saw the civ4 box it spoke to me too

) then they should apologize, becuase asuming that everyone is earnest in thier advertisements, they lied to you and the comunity by saying that we woudnt regret it. But as I noted they didnt say that, they just said that is a good game.
The diffrence between the 2 advertisements is that the " its a good game" advertisement ( the one they used) is subjective and their earnest opinoin, something that they shoudnt apologize for.
while the " you wont regret it" advertisement ( the one you seemed to think they were using) it is factual,for you do, IN FACT, regret buying it. They never said you woudnt regret it, they never said you would like, they merley used thier right to be proud of thier work and said that siv4 rocks and we should buy it.
*phew -=-=-=*
actualy on thing that is more in the last place than the last, last argument. You also said that you dont like that BF2 runs bad on your comp and that it shoudnt because it is within min specs. If you haev the min specs that just means that the game wil run on your computer, but that it will run very badly ( thats what MINUMUM means). Also, had you of waited and read the reviews or looked on forums, you would have known that. All of the reviews i have read said that BF2 is a machine monster, and thier are plenty of people on forums like you who have similar specs who complain that ( with specs like yours) the game tuns terribly.
ps: every game forum i go to this type of thread pops up and every time i say practicly the same thing becuase for soem reason i cant comprehend this type of attack on developers pisses me off the most of all of the trolling that goes on on forums.
no hard feelings blue3c, if i sounded like a *******, its probobly becuase i am

.