LivingDog
Warlord
- Joined
- May 15, 2006
- Messages
- 139
Big difference between the lower level "Warlord" and "Regent." I was wondering if there are some tips about making the switch to a higher level of play.
E.g. I kicked the enemy's AI butt in a Warlord level game. I had TOW infantry and it had Horsemen and Pikemen. Can we say I could have conquered the entire map if I realized the big advantage I had? yes - if I wasn't such a newbie!! Ah well, play and learn. I collected as many resources building a bunch of Cities and Workmen. My income was so high I had 1k+ gold, while setting Research to 60% and Entertainment to 20%. (Please allow me my microsecond of glory - I know this is nothing for experienced players. : )
Apparently this strategy only works against the Warlord AI.
So now that I upped the level to Regent it is quite another story. I had - note HAD - 10 cities, so did (apparently - that's how many I saw at our border) the AI. My cities were near rivers, mountains, with Food 3 and Gold 2. Each had at least one Spearman and some had one Swordsman, one Spearman, and one Warrior. My culture was rocketing towards the modern age. The enemy AI was impressed with my culture.
However, with all those positive values, my cities fell to the AI like warm butter to a hot knife. I tried to avoid building near the AI (my usual strategy is to surround a city and win it without a conflict.) But the AI out maneuvered me apparently building Settlers more often than I did. And it also out fought me in my (what I thought was) well protected cities at the same time! Apparently when the AI attacks a city passed a river, on a hill, protected by a Warrior and Spearman, the AI Spearman always wins. :/
Did S.M. fix the uneven play of the battles/game in CivIV? A thread here mentions that CivIII is simpler to play and not as complicated, but if this unbalanced play persists why bother??
Sorry for the long post. In short there are two requests: 1) tips/threads/links/help-in-general for playing Regent, and 2) is CivIV an improvement?
-thx all,
E.g. I kicked the enemy's AI butt in a Warlord level game. I had TOW infantry and it had Horsemen and Pikemen. Can we say I could have conquered the entire map if I realized the big advantage I had? yes - if I wasn't such a newbie!! Ah well, play and learn. I collected as many resources building a bunch of Cities and Workmen. My income was so high I had 1k+ gold, while setting Research to 60% and Entertainment to 20%. (Please allow me my microsecond of glory - I know this is nothing for experienced players. : )
Apparently this strategy only works against the Warlord AI.
So now that I upped the level to Regent it is quite another story. I had - note HAD - 10 cities, so did (apparently - that's how many I saw at our border) the AI. My cities were near rivers, mountains, with Food 3 and Gold 2. Each had at least one Spearman and some had one Swordsman, one Spearman, and one Warrior. My culture was rocketing towards the modern age. The enemy AI was impressed with my culture.
However, with all those positive values, my cities fell to the AI like warm butter to a hot knife. I tried to avoid building near the AI (my usual strategy is to surround a city and win it without a conflict.) But the AI out maneuvered me apparently building Settlers more often than I did. And it also out fought me in my (what I thought was) well protected cities at the same time! Apparently when the AI attacks a city passed a river, on a hill, protected by a Warrior and Spearman, the AI Spearman always wins. :/
Did S.M. fix the uneven play of the battles/game in CivIV? A thread here mentions that CivIII is simpler to play and not as complicated, but if this unbalanced play persists why bother??
Sorry for the long post. In short there are two requests: 1) tips/threads/links/help-in-general for playing Regent, and 2) is CivIV an improvement?
-thx all,