DarthNader
Destroyer of Worlds
When can we expect an update?
WarNes: Quick and Easy 1936 Nes
- Thread starter Nuka-sama
- Start date
DarthNader
Destroyer of Worlds
When
a) you change your avatar
and
b) USSR sends orders
a.) When I think "jackass", I think of Steve-o's retarted tattoo.
and
b.) Screw the Soviets, RAWR!
DarthNader
Destroyer of Worlds
That settles it! The Soviet Union is officially part of Finland! Yay Finland!!!
DarthNader
Destroyer of Worlds
Be the update coming?
Neverwonagame3
Self-Styled Intellectual
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2006
- Messages
- 3,549
Can I rejoin as the Soviet Union?
Neverwonagame3
Self-Styled Intellectual
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2006
- Messages
- 3,549
If you've quit as them, what right do you have to object? I'll state my case, but not for you.
D'Artagnan59
The Gascon
Can I step in as the Soviets?
Neverwonagame3
Self-Styled Intellectual
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2006
- Messages
- 3,549
Even in that case, what did I do wrong? For Warhead's sake, I state my case:
First I tried to maintain the balance of power by opposing German expansionism, then I got into a bad situation when the French declared war on me. I believe they were planning to anyway- given they accepted it in World War I, why would they not accept blockade warfare in World War II?
Then, when the USSR invaded Poland, I wanted to do something about it. So I persuaded the Germans to attack the USSR, and in time could have defeated both.
Not to mention, if Warhead wants me to change then I will if he specifies direction.
Captain2
ಠ_ృ
you messed up by violently opposing the slightest actions taken, Austria has a majority German population and therefore when Germany annexed it and you started a fuss you looked aggressive while the Germans looked reasonable
not to mention by also attacking the USSR you created a new potential enemy that could have been an ally if you played your card right
if you want to counter expansionism you react in equal measure... they annex a similar culture group without a shot fired? send a formal complaint, your reaction would be acceptable if Germany attacked France without provocation
not to mention by also attacking the USSR you created a new potential enemy that could have been an ally if you played your card right
if you want to counter expansionism you react in equal measure... they annex a similar culture group without a shot fired? send a formal complaint, your reaction would be acceptable if Germany attacked France without provocation
Neverwonagame3
Self-Styled Intellectual
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2006
- Messages
- 3,549
I didn't realise that there was an assumed idea we should play so IC. If I had been allowed to continue playing Britain, I expect that in European affairs something like this would happen:
1: I would persuade Turkey to invade the Soviets
2: The German-Soviet battle would continue, leading ultimately to German victory. British intervention by land would be minimal
3: My navy would over time fight the French&Italian navies so that I would not lose much more terrortory then Azale actually has lost.
4: I would then defeat the winner of the German-Soviet war.
Captain2
ಠ_ృ
1: Turkey has nothing to gain in a war with the USSR, perhaps some border territory but they'd be fighting a much larger force for little gain, in the meantime they'd be risking becoming a puppet
2: Thats possible but war is unpredictable and you would really need to keep an eye out for unexpected possibilities, for example (not saying this would happen) America entering and crushing Germany
3: The territory lost by Azale is entirely because of a surprise attack, and your navy could win against Italy and France but only if its properly used
4:You would be facing an army that, while weakened, controls the entire resource base of the loser. Its a decent plan but you would have had to get Britain far more involved in conquering than you plan implies
2: Thats possible but war is unpredictable and you would really need to keep an eye out for unexpected possibilities, for example (not saying this would happen) America entering and crushing Germany
3: The territory lost by Azale is entirely because of a surprise attack, and your navy could win against Italy and France but only if its properly used
4:You would be facing an army that, while weakened, controls the entire resource base of the loser. Its a decent plan but you would have had to get Britain far more involved in conquering than you plan implies
Neverwonagame3
Self-Styled Intellectual
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2006
- Messages
- 3,549
1: I had a secret deal with the Turks to aid them in Balkan expansion.
2:
i- I could easily cope with Russian victory by attacking them instead.
ii- If America entered, first I could call them for breaking the Monroe Doctrine, and second I would have a good chance of getting the old borders back. America would have to install democracies, and I could swing them away from American influence in time.
iii- I had a strong army, navy, and airforce, and as long as the French didn't destroy my navy the homeland would be scure.
3: Perhaps- but that's a point in my favor from a plan soundness perspective.
4: I meant involving while they were still fighting.
Captain2
ಠ_ృ
1: you again would come off as extremely aggressive if you helped a nation attack other countries unprovoked
2: I'm not limiting it to American interference but I'm simply saying that your plan lacks any kind of flexibility and would be very easily messed up if something you weren't expecting happened
3: Its a decent plan but you intend upon attacking two navies who combined outnumber you and then rely upon the navy entirely for the other plans to work, and thats if the USSR or Germany let you destroy the other two navies, both of who you've declared war upon at one point or another
4: you mean attacking both while they're still fighting? thats even more frighting than the other plan because its the same amount of resources to fight against but the armies aren't even worn out yet, and again you'd appear incredibly aggressive, not to mention you'd scare anyone else out of signing an alliance with you
2: I'm not limiting it to American interference but I'm simply saying that your plan lacks any kind of flexibility and would be very easily messed up if something you weren't expecting happened
3: Its a decent plan but you intend upon attacking two navies who combined outnumber you and then rely upon the navy entirely for the other plans to work, and thats if the USSR or Germany let you destroy the other two navies, both of who you've declared war upon at one point or another
4: you mean attacking both while they're still fighting? thats even more frighting than the other plan because its the same amount of resources to fight against but the armies aren't even worn out yet, and again you'd appear incredibly aggressive, not to mention you'd scare anyone else out of signing an alliance with you
Neverwonagame3
Self-Styled Intellectual
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2006
- Messages
- 3,549
1: I always had bad P.R. This was peripheral to my plan anyway. Unless (which, to be fair, is a possibility) America declared war on me because of it this could not plausibly harm my posistion a great deal.
2: This is a point, but I don't think it's enough to make it illegitimate for me to rejoin.
3: Now I think about it, I probaably would lose the Franco-Italian. But defeat would not be catastrophic.
4: You misunderstand. I meant I would try NOT to fight while they still still in the heat of battle.
I may have made mistakes, but I have admitted them and thus am likely to learn from them.
Captain2
ಠ_ృ
well as long as you learn, I wouldn't bother pointing out problems in planning just to be a jackass
