We want to hear from YOU

[Gort]

User reviews are often just as bad, though for different reasons usually.

 

[Gorbles]

When it comes to a game review, a lot of it is simple user / reader / writer opinion. There are no "objective" game reviews, there never were, and there never will be.

When you call a game review (by a Steam user or a employed professional) "bad", this either means it is bad on a technical level (grammar, etc) or you simply didn't agree with it. Three people can have three different opinions on a game.

Doesn't make any of them right or wrong. It's simply information to be read, that informs your viewpoint as a consequence. I might not agree with a review from a site, but I can learn from it.

 

[Westwall]

What a disappointing survey, having less to do with Civ and more to do with impersonal corporate marketing research.

It's an insult to fans quite frankly.

 

[Ryika]

User reviews are often just as bad, though for different reasons usually.

But... some users at least try to be objective.