What are your three least favourite civs?

[Giga-Gigan]

1. The Hippis
I just don't think they stress the mercenary flavor enough, the bounty hunter promotion would be good, but what I'd really like to see is them actually offering their services to civs that are at war.

2. The Calabim
Their fully realized, their good (at being bad), their unique, but I just don't like them.

3. The Doviello
I want to like them believe me, but they feel marred, damaged, unrealized, incomplete... There has been much talk on what should be done to fix them, whether they need fixing at all. So I won't go into it deeply, but I will say this.

I think that Shamans should start with the medic promotion, its nothing big. However I think it would be a flavorful addition, and help represent the sort of cross purposes that shaman serve for their tribal communities.

 

[Mailbox]

Auric's schizophrenic personality

To be fair, he's bipolar, not schizophrenic.

 

[Nicebeaver]

Are you promoting them to Flanking I, II, and III? I feel that's the most important thing to do for the Hippus.

Trust me, I do. It's just that I get bored with all the horses, who are sort of the whinnying point with the Hippus. I'd might like the Hippus more if their tactics would be more versatile but then they wouldn't be the Hippus.

So for me... Horsies and Hippus out.

 

[danielseses]

Malakim and Hippus - I like the idea behind them (in the case of the Hippus I also find them quite powerful) but I feel that idea isn't fully fleshed out.

Ljosalfar - they seem like the most generic of all the civs in FfH. (yeah i know the whole ancient forest thing.......... Svartalfar have those too and are much more interesting imo)
Also "March of the Trees" has to be the most annoying of all world spells.