What does your army usually look like late game?

[FlubberDubs]

Just a question since I am new. I played my second game on Warlord, and the middle option for all the game types (standard size, temperate 4billion bc etc, 7 opponents). Just curious as to what your army looks like towards the end err maybe 1940 ad. I won my game pretty handily towards the end even though I was 3rd most of the game, I knew my no army, high culture would pay off in the end. Later I massed army when I got some metal and here is what I had.
1) About 80 tanks
2) About 25 F-16's
3) About 60 Armored infantry
4) About 20 Battleships
5) 3 Aircraft Carriers
6) 4 Transports
7) About 20 cities (I found very little corruption, and had massive cities)

I upgraded every town with every building I could essentially. After I had about 50 tanks I decided I had to get out of 3rd place so I took every Iriquois town that I could, while allying the French and being at war with the English and Iriquois. Then after they had one town left below the French I signed peace treaties with everyone again to keep my people happy (I love the King days with a Democracy??? hehe). I also had to take one of the Persian cities (they had the whole other continent) in order to get a airport their and keep them in check. I then won the space race in about 1980's I think.

Enough about me now, what do your armies usually consist of?
Also, how do you go about the game in the later years (tanks etc)?

 

[FullofHoles]

At the end.... well.... they look sort of peaceful. Lying there... sprawled out across the battlefields.

 

[strollen]

My army looked pretty similar
45 infantry
25 Mech
30 Tanks
25 artillery
7 Jets (they are pretty worthless until air superiority gets fixed)
14 bombers
6 modern armor
10 Tac nukes
4 ICBMS
and one Elite Hoplite!
Plus a big navy since the two biggest powers were overseas
5 Destroyers
20 Battleships
3 Carriers
3 Transports

I tweaked the values of battleships (movement 4), Aegis Cruisers and Subs so I built some of them but I wouldn't build many with default settings 10 Aegis, 8 nukes, 2 regulars subs.

I had 25 cities and corruption averaged 4.5%

Personally, I think what is missing from your army is artillery build lots of it...

 

[DBSD13]

I'm not in a late stage just yet, but from past experience in Civ2, there is no need for a large army in late game as most ppl would either be dead or allies.

Of coz, I would ve a couple of Mech Infan in each city but alside from that, I'll have a few tanks n quite a few nukes n an army of engineers to keep my allies incheck.

 

[element|Z]

I hva elike more Modern Armore than all Civs in the game togather

 

[Clutch-3]

Late game modern army: from my first complete game which just finished. It was a large map, all the settings randomized, 11 AI opponents.

~70 Mech Inf. (fortified in cities)
~10 Modern Armor (sleeping in capital, ready to fight off invaders)

that's it. i decided to get going early, wiped out five of the other six civs on my island by about 1300 AD, then with my massive territorial edge i just teched up to spaceship, launched it in 1850s. in my experience being an early warmonger is a pretty decent strat in the new civ... territory seems incredibly important in terms of winning by any of the six methods. i suppose you could get a diplo victory with a smallish empire, but it helps to have a lot of cash to throw around to make the other civs like you. plus, if you expand early your score is a lot higher than if you wait and start warring in the modern age...this game i came out with score > 3000 while in another game i was gonna win by domination and i was still around 1500 with over 50% of the land (got sick of warring, and the end was obvious).