Percee's worried because a while ago he swore to eat everyone's hats if Venice were in BNW
good for you remembering that (and Menzies digging up the quote), I figured I was the most insignificant member of this forum but my antagonism towards Venice has drawn the slightest attention. Ego inflated.
I literally began my diet two days ago. I didn't plan for such a sudden intake in hat. Hopefully not too many caloric hats. I'd expect some tricksters to send edible ones.
I will go down to the last moment on this Venice thing, its how I am. I'm a Libertarian and a Sacramento Kings fan as proof (Americans should get this sorry).
I should explain bringing up the Iroquois; the Motte and Bailey and Axeman have not been resolved, yet only two civs remain. Because of this, I believe in a European civ and a Native American civ filling this spots (as well as much other evidence). To make this work, I see there being changes made to at least the Iroquois. Why? Why would they put a tomahawk using civ with the Iroquois. Two east coast NA tribes, yet no Mississippians, Navajo, Sioux, etc. seems unlikely. I think there is a change being made to the Iroquois to make them a more specified civ rather than the only NA civ. So they will maybe no longer be Iroquois, or they will be heavily changed.
I don't have an answer for the Motte and Bailey. Maybe means nothing.
Menzies, I must ask, since you base your theory of city-states on precedent (even if the sample size is very limited). Is there any precedent for the civ devs directly extracting a color from a flag (wikipedia specifically) to make the colors for a civ? It does seem like a strange move, does it not?
I'm here to be devil's advocate, I don't desire to slander but to challenge, I hope you understand. You have expressed your own desire to avoid Venice as well.