What is the best internet browser?

Originally posted by Gogf
:mad: Liar :p

You're more than welcome to come over any time and watch. I run it on three different machines. A P4 1.8ghz machine with 394mb ram, a 850mhz athalon with 256, and a 1.066ghz celeron also with 256. Each and every machine it takes two to three times as long to load as IE or Avant. Hell, there are times I double click on the Firefox icon, and it won't even load.

If it weren't for the takeover ad blocking, I wouldn't use it. I can get everything else in other browsers that are IE based.
 
Originally posted by RealGoober
Just Mozilla, or Firefox? I just have the regular old Mozilla, I am too lazy to convert to Firefox just yet . . .

Same...

<OFFTOPIC> Holly, it's 6 PM... I gotta get some work doen </OFFTOPIC>
 
@ Fireball - Actually, no, they are different, kind of. Mozilla is the basic model, outdated, Firefox is the new one. It has more features that the regular Mozilla doesn't have . . .

I am simply too bloody lazy to upgrade . . . and don't see the point . . .
 
Well, Mozilla Firefox may be slow, but I find regular old Mozilla to be relatively speedy. Of course, I am comparing it to my Internet Exploder, which took ages to load.

I blame it fully on Telus, my ISP. Such a Piece of Crap . . .
 
Originally posted by RealGoober
@ Fireball - Actually, no, they are different, kind of. Mozilla is the basic model, outdated, Firefox is the new one. It has more features that the regular Mozilla doesn't have . . .

I am simply too bloody lazy to upgrade . . . and don't see the point . . .

*cough* No, I meant same as in I'm in the same situation, I'm too lazy to upgrade to FireFox, too... Don't see the point, either, I think Mozilla loads fast enough, and I generally like it. Will have to upgrade once it gets buggy and no-one fixes it though.

@RealGoober: Mozilla loaded faster than MSIE for you? Wow, thats weird. Mine are close, but IE always loads faster because its native to the OS etc...
 
@ Fireball - We are doing a good job of confusing one another tonight, eh?

Ya, once they stop fixing Mozilla, I will upgrade. I have the upgrade thing buried in my computer somewhere, I just need to click on it . . .

I got some kinda virus thing with Internet Exploder, and it simply son't open, and when it does, I get pop-up madness!!! Also, it is VERY slow . . . Mozilla is ages faster . . .
 
I can't say if Opera is best but I haven't touched Exploder after I started using Opera.
 
@ Fireball - I wouldn't be surprised if my Internet Exploder was chock full of Spyware. I tried it just yesterday, and it opened - for 2 seconds, then got the error, and did the close thing . . .

Mozilla works just fine.

Good choice, Rheinmetall!
 
I have both, use them regularily. Hasn't done a thing.

I just use Mozilla, and complain about Internet Exploder, it seems to work well!!!
 
I use Firefox because of the built in tabbed browsing. Its great. I know you can add it on to Internet Explorer but I rather have it built in. Performance wise I was suprised to see that Internet Explorer was faster. One of the reasons I tried other browsers was that I heard Firefox and Opera were blazing fast and IE was slow. Well I've tried them on mulitple desktops and IE was quicker. None of them are slow or even differ by a large margin.
 
@GA: Well, IE always launches faster because it is native to the OS, while Mozilla nad Opera have to build their own OSes and run in them, thus taking a longer time to load and taking up more CPU Power.
 
Originally posted by FireBall
@GA: Well, IE always launches faster because it is native to the OS, while Mozilla nad Opera have to build their own OSes and run in them, thus taking a longer time to load and taking up more CPU Power.
Could you explain this a bit better? What do you mean with 'build their own OSes'?
 
Well, as far as I understand it, corect me if I'm wrong:

Mozilla and Firefox have to run an extra layer of code over the regular Windows explorer.exe in order to allow the program to execute, similar to having to run a Touring Program in order to make your Turing applet execute. While IE doesn't need another layer, since it works with the allways-running explorer.exe. Thus, since Mozilla has to run that extra layer, it takes longer to run, and it takes more CPU Power...

Once again, correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom