What to do about 527 bodies in a mausoleum nobody wants?

LucyDuke

staring at the clock
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
13,583
Location
where mise
CRANSTON –– Death is permanent; a building’s condition is not.

And, as the temple-like building at 100 Cyr St. crumbles to dust, it threatens the bodies of the 527 people entombed there.

“Eventually, something bad is going to happen,” said Mark Russo, the Providence lawyer in charge of the building.

Thomas Cullinan opened the Roger Williams Park Mausoleum in 1926 as a profit-making enterprise just off the Providence line in the Washington Park neighborhood. The three-story building named for the Providence municipal park that it abuts became a sought-after status symbol among those looking for an eternal resting place for themselves or their loved ones.

As it stands, the building won’t make it to the end of time.

The situation at the three-story, 60-by-66-foot granite building began falling apart nine years ago, with the death of the mausoleum’s last remaining caretaker –– one of Cullinan’s two daughters. When Katherine M. Cullinan died in 2002, her guardian found that almost no money was left for maintenance and repairs. The following year, a Superior Court judge ordered the mausoleum into receivership –– a form of bankruptcy where a court appoints a trustee to either liquidate a company or sell its assets to pay its debt.

In a twist of fate, Joseph P. Ferrucci, the lawyer appointed to find a solution to the mausoleum mess, died in November 2009, leaving the case to Russo, his law partner.

Russo has had no better luck than Ferrucci at solving the vexing problem of what to do with a building that no one wants and no one has the money to close.

It could take $1 million to $2 million to disinter the bodies and bury them elsewhere, Russo estimates.

Just cleaning the inside of the building would take $30,000, said the contractor he hired to inspect the mausoleum.

The roof leaks. Mortar is coming loose. Granite blocks are falling out. Windows are broken and boarded up. Inside, there is water damage, collapsed ceilings and mold, lead paint and asbestos.

The mausoleum has been fenced off to keep vandals at bay — a not wholly successful effort, according to a West Warwick contractor who inspected the building for Russo. There is graffiti inside.

“The building has to come down,” said Phil Pare, of Phil Pare & Sons Inc. “It ain’t worth fixing.”

Russo returned to court recently to ask Superior Court Judge Michael A. Silverstein to order the state or the city to address the situation. The judge, in turn, asked him to lay out the legal rationale for that at a hearing.

The state does not have jurisdiction over such properties. The state Department of Health has not inspected the mausoleum, according to spokeswoman Annemarie Beardsworth.

“I don’t think any city or town has money lying around to take care of this — and neither does the state,” Beardsworth said.

The City of Cranston wants no part of it.

The City Council in 2005 rejected a plan for the city to take ownership of the mausoleum.

City officials cannot go on the property unless an “imminent public-safety issue existed,” said Robin Muksian-Schutt, director of administration for Mayor Allan W. Fung. And then, they would only do enough to stabilize a structure.

“It is a very sensitive situation,” Muksian-Schutt said. “You want to be mindful of the bodies that are in there.”

A plan to renovate the building as a funeral home and crematory never came to fruition.

Russo’s effort to create a nonprofit fund to repair and maintain the building went “nowhere,” said the lawyer.

Fewer than 10 families have claimed their loved ones, Russo said. That’s not surprising, he said, because it would cost several thousand dollars to move a body and inter it elsewhere.

He’s at a loss to resolve the fate of the entombed bodies “in a respectful fashion,” Russo said.

“I can’t take step one unless someone helps,” he said.

ja0510_Mausoleum_amd_2_05-10-11_TQO0LA1.jpg


http://www.projo.com/news/content/ROGER_WILLIAMS_MAUSOLEUM_05-10-11_C5NUQ1J_v21.32d838d.html

Odd how what seemed like a nicer option eighty years ago is now falling apart, while the folks buried in the back yard (the mausoleum abuts a cemetery) don't need more maintenance than a lawn mowing once in a while.

What can be done? What respect (if any) is due these unwanted dead people?
 
Just leave it alone. Let it collapse, have itself become a second tomb.
 
If nobody claims the bodies, burn them. If somebody claims the bodies, get them to pay for removal if they want, otherwise burn them. Clean it out, renovate it, sell the building. Or knock it down and sell the land. If neither of those things are profitable, then tough titties - let it rot.
 
Haunted house - $5 per entry
 
At some point there are just too many dead remains and it gets kind of burdensome to respect them all.
 


If no one wants to deal, cremate the remains and inter somewhere. They may be deserving of respect. But no one seems to be responsible for them. Ultimately the city or state has take over. But that seems unlikely to happen until the building falls down.
 
If no one wants to deal, cremate the remains and inter somewhere. They may be deserving of respect. But no one seems to be responsible for them. Ultimately the city or state has take over. But that seems unlikely to happen until the building falls down.

Why should the city/state foot the bill?
 
Why should the city/state foot the bill?
Why should they keep the streets clean?
Besides, even though this was private enterprise, I presume the mausoleum did not come to be without some sort of a municipal consent, like construction permit or such.
They can try to get descendants of the deceased to pay for the proper relocation of the bodies afterwards, but I don't think they'd succeed. Though I know nothing about US law, so I may be completely off here.
 
It's private property, not a public street. I too don't see what the government has to do with it. People paid money to some company and now the company is bankrupt - the city doesn't need to get involved, just let the liquidators sort it out.
 
Why should the city/state foot the bill?

Morally they probably shouldn't. But that doesn't mean that they won't ultimately get stuck with it. Someday that building will collapse, and then it will be a public hazard. And, by the article, there just isn't anyone else to charge the bill to.
 
It's private property, not a public street. I too don't see what the government has to do with it. People paid money to some company and now the company is bankrupt - the city doesn't need to get involved, just let the liquidators sort it out.
Assuming it wouldn't simply be in public interest to avoid a heap of bones and rubble in a prominent(?) location in the city.
 
Assuming it wouldn't simply be in public interest to avoid a heap of bones and rubble in a prominent(?) location in the city.
If it was prominent it would be easy for the liquidators to sell to a property developer.
 
If it was prominent it would be easy for the liquidators to sell to a property developer.
You've never been involved in real estate, have you? :)
Protip: try building something that actually creates revenue into a popular city park.

...
Actually, that is just bad advice, unless you really don't mind lynch mobs.
 
You've never been involved in real estate, have you? :)
Protip: try building something that actually creates revenue into a popular city park.

...
Actually, that is just bad advice, unless you really don't mind lynch mobs.
Sorry, I don't understand what you're getting at?
 
Back
Top Bottom