which civs would you add?

Who should be added?

  • Canadians

    Votes: 11 13.8%
  • Spanish

    Votes: 38 47.5%
  • Israelites

    Votes: 19 23.8%
  • Mongolians

    Votes: 35 43.8%
  • Brazilians

    Votes: 6 7.5%
  • Portuguese

    Votes: 18 22.5%
  • Austraulians

    Votes: 9 11.3%
  • Irish

    Votes: 10 12.5%
  • Other (feel free to make your choice heard)

    Votes: 28 35.0%

  • Total voters
    80
Originally posted by Sultan Bhargash
America has earned the right to qualify as a great civ, if for no other reason than WE INVENTED CIV 3!

Which proves my point that the US of A are in for commercial reasons.
I take back my remark about the UK, but I was only trying to say that Firaxis for the countries in Europe went for the obvious choices: UK, Germany and France.
Partly because I think the majority still thinks that Europe is built up from those countries. I fully agree agree with Portuguese: they are powers nowadays but not in the old times, and that`s what Civ is all about....
Holland?!? Portugal?!?! Can I eat that? Some Americans still think that Holland is the capital of Scandinavia or something like that.

But no mistake, I think UK should also be in, and France and Germany don`t have to be removed but the Portuguese, Dutch and Vikings made a bigger impact in Europe`s history than those countries did.
 
Originally posted by acjvanv
But no mistake, I think UK should also be in, and France and Germany don`t have to be removed but the Portuguese, Dutch and Vikings made a bigger impact in Europe`s history than those countries did. [/B]

Errrr, I think you made a typo here or you might want to go back to your history book.
 
Originally posted by Shabbaman


Errrr, I think you made a typo here or you might want to go back to your history book.
yes. I second this.
The dutch have been pretty significant. The vikings I couldn't really say the same for. They're just fun.
 
Originally posted by Sultan Bhargash
Sorry to disillusion you Portuguese but they don't teach history in American schools any more. They don't teach much of anything, except possibly how to purchase products from the soda company that sponsors them. But when I was growing up in the seventies and eighties they did teach history.

I learned that though Brittain founded the US Brittain's greatest extent came in the twentieth century when they controlled what is now India, Pakistan, Egypt, Kenya, Tanzania, Australia, Canada, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, etc. etc. etc. etc.

If you want the Civs I would put in an expansion if I was in charge of Firaxis, I have said them before: Ethiopia, Swahili, Inca, Polynesia, Turks, Dutch, and Swahili would be definite. I would want to see several others in time, including the Kwakiutl of north America, the Lapps, the Mayans, the Portuguese (I would be tempted to call them Brazilians and make Dom Pedro the II the leader), Hebrews and Arabs, Scandinavians, etc. etc. etc. (In fact if I ruled Firaxis you would be able to download another civ every month complete with its own architecture, leaders, citizen faces, unique unit, probably unique improvement or wonder).

I recognise that UK empire was bigger at the 20th century, but I meant in terms of power... in 19th century, France and German grown strong competitors, and in 20th USA completelly took it from the 1st place in world's leadership.

I'm happy with your new civs (except from Portuguese exclusion, that I think it is unfair, due to our major influence in 15th and 16th centuries... and for the Vikings, who also lacks in your list). But I liked the list and above all that idea of adding a new civ each month. Sultan Bhargash to CEO of Firaxis!! :goodjob:

:( I only did't like to read that history is not given at school this days. I hope you were kidding about it...
 
Originally posted by Sultan Bhargash
I learned that though Brittain founded the US Brittain's greatest extent came in the twentieth century when they controlled what is now India, Pakistan, Egypt, Kenya, Tanzania, Australia, Canada, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, etc. etc. etc. etc.
Egypt and several other parts of Africa were never really owned, and anyhow only more or less governed (as a trustee) after they had already lost Canada and Australia in 1907.

So how does this add up to a quarter of the planet (and, btw, it hardly overlaps eg the Spanish claims despite being of a different century). AFAIK the Mongol empire was the largest ever in square km, and that wasn't a quarter either.
 
Originally posted by Portuguese


Where is the typo? Didn't dutch, vikings and portuguese have a major impact in European history? Who must go back to his history books?

I don't, but you should read what I write before reacting prematurely and go into flaming/spamming mode.

acjvanv wrote that Portugal, The Netherlands and Vikings (...) have had a bigger impact on European history than Germany, England and France. I doubt that because it's simply not true. History is far too complicated to make such a statement, but The Netherlands is definitely NOT a defining nation in Europe. And, for your information, I'm perfectly aware of my national history.
 
Originally posted by Shabbaman


I don't, but you should read what I write before reacting prematurely and go into flaming/spamming mode.

acjvanv wrote that Portugal, The Netherlands and Vikings (...) have had a bigger impact on European history than Germany, England and France. I doubt that because it's simply not true. History is far too complicated to make such a statement, but The Netherlands is definitely NOT a defining nation in Europe. And, for your information, I'm perfectly aware of my national history.

OK. Sorry then. Got to read all the posts next time :D
 
I wasn't the one who said it was a quarter of the planet, but as an American who works in Africa alot I always thank the UK for spreading English around.

bobgote - more than half of us sure do hate our "government", but unless I am mistaken, you guys have less of an excuse because you got to vote yours in.

Portuguese - alright, fine the Portuguese are in. And as my first act as CEO of Firaxis, I'm not going to give them or the Dutch special units. Who needs yet another horsemen/swordsmen anyway? Instead, the Dutch get the special improvement of windmill, acts like a coal plant but comes into play with Invention. The Portuguese get the special technology of lateen sails, comes in with navigation, improves the movement of all their ships by two.

As for the Vikings, I wouldn't say they were useless as a civ. They found their way to the new world, they traded deep into Russia and down to north Africa, they ultimately decided against becoming Islamic when they had the chance (NO MEAD? HAH!) and they forced other civs to react in ways they wouldn't have, including the spread of Christianity and organization into states.

Borrowing a tactic from America's current CEO, my second act as head of Firaxis would be to refund half of the price of civ 3 to everyone who had to suffer through two patches and still aren't always getting to build their palace...
 
Other:

Hippies
Civ characteristics: Laid-back & Pacifistic
Unique Unit: Yogi Explorer Unit, increases chance of other civ's cities culture flipping to you
May not use any tiles with cattle!
 
Originally posted by Sultan Bhargash

If you want the Civs I would put in an expansion if I was in charge of Firaxis, I have said them before: Ethiopia, Swahili, Inca, Polynesia, Turks, Dutch, and Swahili would be definite. I would want to see several others in time, including the Kwakiutl of north America, the Lapps, the Mayans, the Portuguese (I would be tempted to call them Brazilians and make Dom Pedro the II the leader), Hebrews and Arabs, Scandinavians, etc. etc. etc.

The Lapps?!?

To begin with, the term "Lapps" isn't politically correct anymore. You're supposed to say Sámi.

I very strongly think they should not be in a Civ game. They've never had cities (all cities in the Sámi area has been founded by others, and none has a Sámi majority). They've never been politically united, nor possessed any advanced politcal institutions of their own. They've been mostly nomadic until modern times. If they're qualified as a "civilization" in the game, any number of nomadic groups around the globe are.
 
Originally posted by bobgote
They are currently a power that is the linchpin of the middle east. If they fall, the US will have little or no influence there. Be very thankful.


Israel is a hinderance to US foreign policy in the middle east. Our relations with many countries (Jordan, Saudi, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, and the small Gulf states) would be much smoother if not for the Israeli conflict.

we sent planes to fly refugees from kosovo to australia, but when they make their own way here from war-torn afghanistan, we turn them away.

Kosovars are paler than Afghans, no?

I hate my government. (I hope you americans feel the same way about yours)

Absolutely.:)
 
Originally posted by bobgote
I hate my government. (I hope you americans feel the same way about yours)

Absolutely not! I would not want to be a citizen of any other country in the world, and I can't believe you feel otherwise, Carver.

originally posted by Carver
Israel is a hinderance to US foreign policy in the middle east. Our relations with many countries (Jordan, Saudi, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, and the small Gulf states) would be much smoother if not for the Israeli conflict.
Israel is the only true Democracy in the region and is our only true ally in the middle east. Our relations with the rest of the region would be much smoother if they would agree to quit supporting terrorists and opening thier elections, allowing women to vote and coming out of the 16th century.
 
Originally posted by Sultan Bhargash
Portuguese - alright, fine the Portuguese are in. And as my first act as CEO of Firaxis, I'm not going to give them or the Dutch special units. Who needs yet another horsemen/swordsmen anyway? Instead, the Dutch get the special improvement of windmill, acts like a coal plant but comes into play with Invention. The Portuguese get the special technology of lateen sails, comes in with navigation, improves the movement of all their ships by two.

Borrowing a tactic from America's current CEO, my second act as head of Firaxis would be to refund half of the price of civ 3 to everyone who had to suffer through two patches and still aren't always getting to build their palace...

Each new post you are getting better! ;)

I'd agree on that special sea movement. Very good idea, as caravels won't be of great use and "naus" already exist as man-o-wars" :goodjob:

And that idea of reward the beta players I'm sure it would please us all! :D

Good inputs!:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Wow, the Last Conformist, location Sweden, totally dumping on the Sami (I guess you would want us to call the Finns the Suomi and the Swiss the Confederation Helvetica?). Just because a culture doesn't conform to our idea of a civ (cities, writing, women voting, whatever) doesn't mean we should strongly object to their inclusion. The Sami are still as Civvy as the Iroquois, and as far as nomads, well wouldn't your Vikings more or less appear that way to us today?

Kal-el, you can hate your government and love your country. I am sure you were probably in that position during the Clinton regime, if you like these guys so much.

Portuguese, voce ja foi ao Brasil? It is your version of America, fascinating place. I go in three weeks de novo. Vivi em Rio de Janeiro um ano. Muito boa.
 
I guess its a matter of symantics. I was thinking more along the lines of form of government not necessarily about the current administration. The Administration changes at least every 8 years, the government has remained relatively the same for the past 226 years.
 
The vikings had a tremendous impact on world history.

The Vikings gave birth to the Ukraine and Russia. They civilized the Ukraine, turning it from a big 'ol plain into the beginings of the agrarian powerhouse we know it as today. In fact, the word "Rus" is the viking name for the Ukraine, and it is from this that the whole of Russia takes its name.

The Vikings once stretched all the way to Constantinople, and that was when Constantanople was a world leading metropolis.

And what's all this about the German's creating atomic weapons. I mean, what the h*ll? They gave the world nuclear fission, but it's a long way from that to the atom bomb. In fact, their atom bomb project in WWII was totally pursuing the wrong leads -- they weren't even close.
 
Originally posted by acjvanv
Originally posted by Sultan Bhargash
Holland?!? Portugal?!?! Can I eat that? Some Americans still think that Holland is the capital of Scandinavia or something like that.

Isn't Holland a town in Pennsylvania??
 
Originally posted by Portuguese
It's interesting to see how europeans and americans don't agree on... European History! I wonder who is right... :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

this is an easy one. we the americans are allways right, didnt you know that portuguese? :crazyeye:
 
Back
Top Bottom