Which leader do you play most like?

[Antilogic]

There really isn't an ai that plays as well as me on noble.

Hehehe... I think many players may share that sentiment.

The human is wily, dastardly, and unrelenting.

 

[Lemon Merchant]

The human is wily, dastardly, and unrelenting.

And occasionally confused, misguided, and behaves like a Diva.

 

[GGracchus]

There is no AI that can beat me. I have worldbuilder.

 

[Seron]

Roosevelt would probablt be who I play like most. Unfortunately, I don't see him on your poll!

 

[Lalabunny]

I like both Indian leaders; Asoka and Gandhi

I like most leaders with the Spiritual and Philo traits.

 

[CHEESE!]

Zara Yaqob.

Neener neener neener.

 

[Tycho]

Bismarck here. Mostly because of his Industrious trait with the wonder construction rate increase and speed of forge and granary completion. Expansive also helps out a lot.

Other than that, Roosevelt comes in for the same reason as Bismarck with the industrious trait, and Wang Kon at third because I like to use the cottage economy to start world wars.

 

[God-Emperor]

In this thread: way too many people who can't tell the difference between "which leader do you play most like" and "which leader do you like to play most".

I might play most like Mansa Musa, maybe. (With a pinch of Gandhi and a hint of Ragnar.)

I prefer to peacefully muddle along building way more buildings and wonders than I should and building up my economy to high levels and trying to get a solid tech lead, mostly forgoing short term advantages for long term advantages. When someone declares war on me, which is pretty much inevitable, I usually then either wipe them out as an example to the other AIs (who are, sadly, much too stupid to notice the example - it ought to store some information about how that last attempt by someone to attack a civ did) or stop when I'm tired of pounding on them and they are willing to offer me something that is not pitifully useless, or when their last cities are of on some island I don't want to bother tracking down. Then it's back to overbuilding and economic development until the next "incident".

 

[Strikercups]

I play like Willem the most cause I barely declare war on anyone and I focus on my income

 

[Seron]

I prefer to peacefully muddle along building way more buildings and wonders than I should and building up my economy to high levels and trying to get a solid tech lead, mostly forgoing short term advantages for long term advantages. When someone declares war on me, which is pretty much inevitable, I usually then either wipe them out as an example to the other AIs (who are, sadly, much too stupid to notice the example - it ought to store some information about how that last attempt by someone to attack a civ did) or stop when I'm tired of pounding on them and they are willing to offer me something that is not pitifully useless, or when their last cities are of on some island I don't want to bother tracking down. Then it's back to overbuilding and economic development until the next "incident".

You play the exact same way I usually do...

And welcome to CFC stikercups.

 

[uat2d]

Peaceful players, pffft

Please...

 

[Seron]

Peaceful players, pffft

Please...

Note that I crush people when they declare war on me. And I said usually...


Sometimes I declare war on people just for the thrill....

 

[xcrissxcrossx]

I play most like Mansa Musa, and I am sad he isn't on the list. But I try to stay on everyone's good side and am a tech and money hog.

 

[Yoshiegg737]

I would pick Saladin, but he's not on the poll!!!

I'll go with Bismarck, then

 

[reddishrecue]

I play like Gilgamesh because of creativity and protectiveness especially in the castle era where the bonus really gets better with the increased espionage from castles but hes not on the list.

 

[AJ11]

Note that I crush people when they declare war on me. And I said usually...


Sometimes I declare war on people just for the thrill....

Heh heh heh. The AI is really stupid when declaring war:

Me - Buddhist
Aztecs - Buddhist
Sioux - Buddhist
Dutch - Buddhist
German - Buddhist
Songhai - Hindu

Random event: Wedding against Hindu wishes. Pick: Lavish gifts, national holiday, etc.

Songhai declares war!

10 turns later: The Songhai Empire has been destroyed!

Seriously. Declare war on the human player with the super friendly Aztec buddy who is right next door to you? Yeah. Idiot got Monty'd.

 

[uat2d]

If Songhai was a human player, he'd also be in Buddhism, even if he only had it in one city versus Hinduism in all of them.

If everyone was a human player, religion wouldn't mean a thing.

 

[AJ11]

If Songhai was a human player, he'd also be in Buddhism, even if he only had it in one city versus Hinduism in all of them.

If everyone was a human player, religion wouldn't mean a thing.

A human player would look at all the Buddhists around him, especially a warhound like Monty, and NOT choose the option to declare a holy war in retaliation to the other side prancing on the borders and yelling, "I fart in your general direction!"

 

[ephexed]

monty here, food + slaves + sacrificial Alt. = face melt.

 

[digitalcraft]

Probably one of the financial leaders. I try to get a strong economy going to get a big lead. I usually leave people alone that are friendly. I do try for a religious hegemony but that's more for the political and financial bonus than any sort of crusader mentality.