Loaf Warden
(no party affiliation)
I hope this thread will not be closed, as it is not an attempt at drawing flames toward anyone, but is rather an honest attempt to understand what about these words has changed them from 'acceptable' to 'objectionable'.
The words I refer to are 'Oriental' and 'Chinaman'.
'Oriental' simply comes from a Latin word for 'east'. No one objects when people from China, Japan, Korea, etc. are called 'Easterners'. Why is the Germanic version acceptable when the Latinate version is now offensive? For my part, as an American of European extraction, I am very much a Westerner, and if someone called me an Occidental, I really couldn't see getting upset about it. And this doesn't just refer to the people, either. You never hear anyone saying 'the Orient' or 'Oriental cooking' anymore. I'd suggest that it has something to do with an abandonment of the old Eurocentric view that saw anything east of Europe as the East, East with a capital E . . . except that those regions are still referred to as the East. East Asia itself is not often called 'the Far East' anymore, but I don't know anyone who ever calls the Middle East anything except the Middle East. And while not many people, perhaps, call East Asians 'Easterners', as I already noted at least no one finds the word offensive.
As for 'Chinaman', I don't understand why this is a derogatory term now, either. It seems as good a term as any for a grown Chinese man, and would fit right in alongside other non-offensive terms like 'Englishman', 'Irishman', 'Scotsman', and 'Frenchman'. Again, while 'Alaskaman' is not a word, if someone started using such a word and addressed me as such, I certainly wouldn't be offended. While 'Chinaman', a word very much on the same model, is considered degrading now. But I honestly don't understand how it degrades a grown man who comes from China to call him that. It seems like a purely descriptive term to me.
So if anyone has any ideas on how or why these once-acceptable words are now treated as though they were racial slurs, I'd be quite curious to hear them.
The words I refer to are 'Oriental' and 'Chinaman'.
'Oriental' simply comes from a Latin word for 'east'. No one objects when people from China, Japan, Korea, etc. are called 'Easterners'. Why is the Germanic version acceptable when the Latinate version is now offensive? For my part, as an American of European extraction, I am very much a Westerner, and if someone called me an Occidental, I really couldn't see getting upset about it. And this doesn't just refer to the people, either. You never hear anyone saying 'the Orient' or 'Oriental cooking' anymore. I'd suggest that it has something to do with an abandonment of the old Eurocentric view that saw anything east of Europe as the East, East with a capital E . . . except that those regions are still referred to as the East. East Asia itself is not often called 'the Far East' anymore, but I don't know anyone who ever calls the Middle East anything except the Middle East. And while not many people, perhaps, call East Asians 'Easterners', as I already noted at least no one finds the word offensive.
As for 'Chinaman', I don't understand why this is a derogatory term now, either. It seems as good a term as any for a grown Chinese man, and would fit right in alongside other non-offensive terms like 'Englishman', 'Irishman', 'Scotsman', and 'Frenchman'. Again, while 'Alaskaman' is not a word, if someone started using such a word and addressed me as such, I certainly wouldn't be offended. While 'Chinaman', a word very much on the same model, is considered degrading now. But I honestly don't understand how it degrades a grown man who comes from China to call him that. It seems like a purely descriptive term to me.
So if anyone has any ideas on how or why these once-acceptable words are now treated as though they were racial slurs, I'd be quite curious to hear them.