Hi
Just curious about people and agri, i notice it is rated extremely highly in most the CIV write-ups. Why do people rate it so highly?.
Having picked a random civ for another emporer attempt i got maya
who are agri. Effect seems to be 1 extra food for the city IF on a river.
This can mean initial expansion speeding up of course, but if on a map
position with few rivers isnt it a bit of a poor trait?. Also by the mid area of the game a single extra food doesnt seem a big deal?. Or do agri players tend to go to war earlier?.
Do people consider the slight extra speed of expansion initially worth more than traits with obvious benefits for the entire game?.
Determined to give agri a try, but thoughts on maximising the agri trait (and downgraded IND) would be appreciated..ive only really played commerce/sea on monarch and above up to now.
Just curious about people and agri, i notice it is rated extremely highly in most the CIV write-ups. Why do people rate it so highly?.
Having picked a random civ for another emporer attempt i got maya
who are agri. Effect seems to be 1 extra food for the city IF on a river.
This can mean initial expansion speeding up of course, but if on a map
position with few rivers isnt it a bit of a poor trait?. Also by the mid area of the game a single extra food doesnt seem a big deal?. Or do agri players tend to go to war earlier?.
Do people consider the slight extra speed of expansion initially worth more than traits with obvious benefits for the entire game?.
Determined to give agri a try, but thoughts on maximising the agri trait (and downgraded IND) would be appreciated..ive only really played commerce/sea on monarch and above up to now.