Why would buy a lab-grown engagement ring?

Would you buy a man-made as an engagement ring?

  • Yes

    Votes: 42 65.6%
  • No

    Votes: 6 9.4%
  • I propose with a ring-pop

    Votes: 16 25.0%

  • Total voters
    64
Devils Advocate:
But isn't the whole point of getting your significant other a diamond ring that it signifies the rarity of her beauty and intelligence? She isn't just some mass produced shiny pretender, and neither should her diamonds be.

Well? Cheapskates. The lot of you.
 
Devils Advocate:
But isn't the whole point of getting your significant other a diamond ring that it signifies the rarity of her beauty and intelligence? She isn't just some mass produced shiny pretender, and neither should her diamonds be.

Well? Cheapskates. The lot of you.

Natural diamonds are not rare.
 
I'd ask her about it, if I wasn't planning on surprising her (if I was, well, I make it a hypothetical situation). A ring is basically a social contract. It's a human thing. Trying to take a one size fits all approach to that is just pointless. Some girls want big rocks. Others dislike the idea of blood diamonds. Others however, want tradition. And really, it's a gift to her. Even if you think it's silly, she deserves what she wants.
 
I'd ask her about it, if I wasn't planning on surprising her (if I was, well, I make it a hypothetical situation). A ring is basically a social contract. It's a human thing. Trying to take a one size fits all approach to that is just pointless. Some girls want big rocks. Others dislike the idea of blood diamonds. Others however, want tradition. And really, it's a gift to her. Even if you think it's silly, she deserves what she wants.

I'm in support of the idea of going with what you think is best, and then doing the whole surprise thing, and then after it's all settled in, discuss the matter with her. You can always exchange and such, especially if it's an important thing to her.
 
Devils Advocate:
But isn't the whole point of getting your significant other a diamond ring that it signifies the rarity of her beauty and intelligence? She isn't just some mass produced shiny pretender, and neither should her diamonds be.
If she is intelligent, then she would realize a $3000 diamond ring is a waste of money. As I said earlier, I would rather get her a custom-made ring with something like alexanderite in it, and then she would have a ring unlike any other. That would be much note unique than one of the many diamond rings out there.
Well? Cheapskates. The lot of you.
Yes, and? I consider not burdening my significant other with financial worries a much better gift than a shiny rock. A $3000 investment could be worth $50,000 by the time you retire. The ring? Well... that would probably be worth ~$8000 after inflation.
 
No, because women are more interested in how you paid for the ring rather than how it was made.
 
I would just buy her a ring pop. They taste way better than a diamond.
 
Why buy?? I'll just steal the Golden Jubilee Diamond from the Thai crown jewels!

PumpkinDiamond.jpg


:drool: 545.67 carats of pure Love! :love:
 
I would, cos I think its cooler.

BUT

I also think vintage diamonds are cool...
 
This is excellent. Now that the West can produce these cheaply it should secretly flood the gray market with these real diamonds whose value is dependent on the buyer's knowledge of its source. The devaluation of the diamond will mean that the West can stop funding those African warlords so that they'll have to use spears and stuff instead of Kalashnikovs and RPGs. Dare I say it? It will be awesome.

GG modern armor. :eek:
 
If I wanted a diamond, of course I would try to get an artificial one. That way I am funding diamond research and not some shady mining company. But the best way would be to make the diamond yourself in the lab. That would be personal instead of just spending some cash.


I wish, there was a way to avoid this ring business, though. Rings are a nuisiance, if you always have to remember to take them off for work.
 
RSeriously I've never understood the obsession with diamonds. They're ugly and tacky.
Yeah, I never got that either. You'd think it'd be better to get her a stone which she actually likes, rather than whatever's just the most expensive.
 
No, you really can't tell.
You certainly can tell the difference, just not visually. The crystal structure is different. Synthetic diamonds also have a laser inscription required by US law.

The GIA recognizes them as diamonds.
Once again, as the article I posted above clearly shows, the GIA now GRADES synthetic diamonds while at the same time permanently marking them even further to assure there can be no deception. They also give them a different color classification certificate so you cannot use their grading to try to dupe unsuspecting people.

They are the exact same as mined flawless diamonds.
Once again, no they are not. They are synthetically produced instead of bein naturally made.

The difference between natural and synthetic diamonds may not matter to you, but it certainly matters to their value on the open market.

I'd ask her about it, if I wasn't planning on surprising her (if I was, well, I make it a hypothetical situation). A ring is basically a social contract. It's a human thing. Trying to take a one size fits all approach to that is just pointless. Some girls want big rocks. Others dislike the idea of blood diamonds. Others however, want tradition. And really, it's a gift to her. Even if you think it's silly, she deserves what she wants.
I agree completely. Deliberately deceiving your future wife with an item that she can easily find out the truth by visiting any jewelry store is probably not the best way to start a long-term relationship. When cubic zirconia became really cheap a few decades ago, a lot of men did just this. I bet a lot of them are divorced now.

This is excellent. Now that the West can produce these cheaply it should secretly flood the gray market with these real diamonds whose value is dependent on the buyer's knowledge of its source. The devaluation of the diamond will mean that the West can stop funding those African warlords so that they'll have to use spears and stuff instead of Kalashnikovs and RPGs. Dare I say it? It will be awesome.
Ironically, that is exactly what won't happen due to the laws enacted to protect people from exactly that sort of fraud.

You may not personally agree with the way DeBeers does business. I certainly don't. But this should have no effect on the overally diamond market until everybody decides to no longer purchase natural diamonds for social reasons. They certainly haven't shown much of an inclination to do that yet. After all, diamonds and other rare natural stones which are typically mined by exploited people aren't necessities.

And take a look at the fur industry. It wasn't high-grade fake furs that largely doomed them. It was declining demand created by a hostile reaction by many. If you continue to wear synthetic diamonds, you are actually supporting instead of hurting the efforts to end such rampant exploitation because nobody will be able to discern the difference without a loupe.
 
BE2CD15R25S_yellow_top_lg.jpg

IMHO Sapphire>Diamond
 
If she is intelligent, then she would realize a $3000 diamond ring is a waste of money. As I said earlier, I would rather get her a custom-made ring with something like alexanderite in it, and then she would have a ring unlike any other. That would be much note unique than one of the many diamond rings out there.

Yes, and? I consider not burdening my significant other with financial worries a much better gift than a shiny rock. A $3000 investment could be worth $50,000 by the time you retire. The ring? Well... that would probably be worth ~$8000 after inflation.

Love isn't rational. Sometimes you have to do irrational things to show how crazy in love you are. Its not about what you can afford, its about what she deserves. :mischief:
 
Back
Top Bottom