lovett
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Messages
- 2,570
Had had no reason to believe what he said. He had not even been briefed by the military yet when he called it 'cold-blooded murder'.
One does not go saying the sort of crap he did based on 'insider rumors' and he damn well knows that. But he did it anyway. That's why it is malicious and self-serving.
I don't know enough about the bloke to make a judgement either way. But it appears that he's a pretty fanatical anti-war type. As such, he probably made up his mind about the issue a good time before Haditha. He may well have already decided that US marines were doing lots of unsavoury things in Iraq.
So, in the long tradition of selection bias, he seems something that supports his position and jumps on it. He doesn't critically examine it because he's already convinced about the issue at stake. The result being that he listens to sources which support his own opinion, ignores ones that don't and publicises the former. The result being that he may well have sincerely believed what he was saying, and thus is guilty of gross negligence and incompetence as opposed to simple malicious lieing.