Well just prior to that he points out that the gray wolf is a predator that is killing animals and the members of congress who don't have wolves in their district fail to understand the real world impact of wolves and don't care about the concerns of his contituents- especially Alaskan natives.
So when he says that if wolves were introduced to these districts there wouldn't be a homeless problem anymore he is making a hyperbolic point about real world consequences. He is saying that those members who don't have to worry about wolves in their districts can blissfully disregard or minimize the impacts of their suggestions because they don't have to deal with the consequences. They can look at wolves through a rose colored lens and let others worry about what actually plays out. He is effective saying "better be careful what you wish for others" because if the tables were turned and you had to deal with the problem your constituents would be screaming about it.
Bottom line- this was not a hearing about the homeless problem and Young was not offering any solutions. So anyone who wants to accuse Rep. Young of actually suggesting wolves as a solution for the homeless is either:
a.) willfully disengenious and ok with putting words in someone's mouth for your own selfish purposes (congrats- you're actually the wolf)
b.) allowed that little poison pill from Huff Post to get inside their head, reinforce their biases and shape how their brain processed this without exercising critical thinking or making any attempt to really understand what Rep. Young was saying. (congrats, you're a sheep)
