Worst game console ever.

They Neo Geo failed ?
Too expensive and too focused on one genre, but the system wasn't even meant for the mainstream market. It was around for a pretty long time and I think it did fairly well in it's little niche. It was neither badly designed nor a financial desaster like other consoles listed here.

It's worst becoz ordinary kids dont get to play with it.
 
Not exactly game consoles, but did anyone else have those Tiger handheld lcd games. I got like a million of them. They mostly sucked.
Tiger-DoubleDragon.jpg
 
Not exactly game consoles, but did anyone else have those Tiger handheld LCD games. I got like a million of them. They mostly sucked.
Tiger-DoubleDragon.jpg

Yes I remember those quite fondly, if my memory serves me correctly didn't they make a version that read barcodes?
 
I don't know, personally. Here's a list of what's considered crap and my take on it:

Jaguar sucked, the CD add-on was sporadic.
3DO was $800 and had no games.
Sega CD I've never played (even though I have one) (I blame its failure on the reliance on FMV games, if they pushed the others [Snatcher, Lunar, Sonic CD]), and the 32X is surprisingly good. Virtua Racing and Knuckles' Chaotix kick ass.
CD-i made a mockery of Zelda and Mario.
Virtual Boy: The games released in North America is less than my age. Also, caused various problems.

Now, the worst ever made has to be the Gizmondo, a portable system. Imagine yourself playing your DS or PSP. Then, after finishing a boss, an ad pops up. That was basically the Gizmondo's plan on cutting costs. With ads, it was $230 (still $70-$100 less than its competition). Without, $400 (I'd rather get a next-gen console for the same price, thank you). The planned GPS never came to fruition, and only eight games were ever released out of the 14 planned to be.
 
Back
Top Bottom