King of Spades
Chieftain
Considering how fierce a farmer can be, why not a pikeman? 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2391.htm

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2391.htm
Actually I disagree, Modern units shouldn't do damage to the Air units unless they have interception. Interception/AA should be the Only way air units take damage.
Stone vs nukes.
No David killed Goliath or?![]()
The targeting sensors on modern aircraft are incredibly complex- so much so, that it is impossible to blind someone through targeting cameras-- it just washes out the image, in which case the sensor can typically be toggled between Infrared, Day-TV, and/or Radar imagery.Just pretend that the pilot zoomed in on his target, the pikeman. By some random fluke of nature, the sun shone just perfect on the spear tip, causing it to blind the pilot and crash the plane.
They aren't as "standard" as you would think. MANPADs can be integrated into a fighting unit, but in the case of Stealth aircraft, there are such an absurd amount of countermeasures that most shoulder-fired SAMs become almost no-factor. The biggest IRL threats to aircraft are a combination of AAA sites, 1-3 types of tactical SAMs, and 2-4 different types of strategic SAMs.considering that Surface to Air missiles are fairly 'standard' kit for modern units, I'd say let them fight back. It's not like they do much damage anyways; unless they have interception.
This would also cover earlier air units, such as fighters who really do have to get low to the ground to shoot.
Think of it more like 'close air support' when air units attack units and 'bombing' when they attack cities.
Fixed.OMG, I was playing chess and I got killed by a lousy pawn!!!
Surely that cant be right cos the pawn can't reach me.
OMG, I was playing chess and my Queen got killed by a lousy pawn!!!
Surely that cant be right cos the queen is like 100x more powerful.
Actually that is serious unrealism in chess... a Queen more powerful than a Pawn in Combat... Seriously I don't think a Queen could deal any type of damage versus some peasant.
The fact is Strength wise it should be
Castle (way above the rest)
..
..
King (since he is likely a Knight himself)
Knight
Bishop (possibly a Knight, but not as likely)
..
..
Pawn
Queen
OMG, I was playing chess and my Queen got killed by a lousy pawn!!!
Surely that cant be right cos the queen is like 100x more powerful.
I don't agree with the comparison. A queen isn't worth 100 pawns. A queen is worth roughly 9 pawns and it's not a stretch to say a pawn can take down a queen since they both have access to each other. Whereas a stealth bomber operates miles above the earth and there's no possible way a pike can be thrown that far even if the guy could see it.
I don't think it's a huge deal but there should be some sort of rule that after so many technological advances a unit is unable to counterattack another unit. Or at least unable to counterattack flying units unless you have researched rifling.
Bishop should be right down there with "Queen", as a Bishop is really just a priest.
Given how these aircraft operate... a man would have to hurl a stick miles into the sky, at night, at a fast-moving target, that was colored black, without hearing the bomber, before getting blown up... and still cause enough damage to require maintenance for months. Weapons that are designed for this kind of thing have trouble inflicting that kind of damage.
A Bishop could be a "knight" as well (Remember certain popes of the time were warriors)
although probably a bit below