$200,000 Zero Energy Home

blackheart

unenlightened
Joined
Jul 22, 2004
Messages
8,633
Location
Chicago
Discovery News Article
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060529/zeroehome_tec.html

May 31, 2006 — A for-profit home builder has constructed a house priced under $200,000 that, in an average year, costs nothing to power or heat.

The so-called zero-energy home, built by Norman, Oklahoma-based Ideal Homes, is priced affordably even though it incorporates some of the latest technology and energy-efficient construction available today.

"I think Americans have this concept in their head that a zero-energy house costs a million dollars," said Vernon McKown, co-founder of Ideal Homes, who partnered with the U.S. Department of Energy's Building America program for the project.

In fact, a zero energy house built two years ago in Frisco, Texas by Aderson Sargent Custom Builder, spanned about 3,000 square feet and was priced at around $1 million.

But for Ideal Homes' 1,650 square-foot house, McKown worked with the Boston-based Building Science Consortium, an architectural consulting firm, to use computer simulations developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).

The simulations showed how making a few construction modifications as well as adding some high-end technology could achieve the energy-efficient abode.

For starters, the builder added long-lasting compact fluorescent lights, which use far less energy than incandescent bulbs. And instead of laying down pink fiberglass insulation, they blew in cellulose, which is better at reducing air flow within walls and ceilings.

Other modifications — including installing vinyl-framed, low-emittance windows, sealing duct work and installing heat-reflecting solar board under the rooftop shingles — helped reduce the home's energy requirements. Then getting it down to zero required investing in a few high-end components.

Instead of using a conventional air conditioner and furnace, the home was outfitted with a ground-source heat pump. This equipment circulates a fluid through coils of pipes buried 200 feet in the ground, where temperatures remain constant at about 60 degrees Fahrenheit.

The system uses the piped fluid in combination with a heat exchanger or a heater to cool and heat the house.

Because the starting temperature is always around 60 degrees, the rest of the system doesn't have to work hard to reach the desired comfort zone, which may be somewhere between 68 and 74 degrees.

Ideal Homes also installed a tankless water heater, which works to instantly heat temperate water on an as-needed basis.

Although all of these components work together to reduce the home's overall energy consumption, a zero-energy home must generate its own power. To this end, Ideal Homes installed rooftop solar panels, which produce approximately 6,600 kilowatt hours of electricity per year.

During months when the house needs more energy, it draws it from the local power grid. But during months when it is producing more electricity than it needs, it transfers the energy back into the grid for a credit.

At the end of the year, the home's energy bills averages zero.

So far the home, built in September 2005, is living up to its claim.

"It's saving about 85 percent [of the] energy from the builder's normal product, which is already better than code," said Ron Judkoff, director of the Buildings and Thermal Systems Center at the NREL.

Ideal Homes is currently renting out their zero-energy home in order to retain rights to study its performance over time. Knowledge they gain from this house will go into incorporating energy-efficient technology into their mainstream production.

Sounds like a very good idea
 
I really like this idea. When it comes time for me to find a home, which is far in the future about 5 years. I will remember this.
 
Isn't $200,000 a lot for a home in Oklahoma? I would guess that it would be like... $1 million... here. It'd be nice if it wasn't, though.
 
In this country you'd be lucky to get a 3 bedroomed energy draining house atm anywhere for that price, although that's because of inflated house prices, only way most people can afford acomodation here is marriage and two good slaries or renting.

If I had the money I'd love to buy one of these houses, I'd imagine it would save money in the long run and I could be all smug and superior about my carbon foot print :)
 
And a desire to move to Norman, Oklahoma. :crazyeye:

I'd say that, in my area, you could probably get 75-100% more square feet for the same price. Of course, I'd say housing is at least a little more expensive there.
 
Awesome.

I'd buy that house, if it wasn't in oklahoma, and I had the money.
 
damn, you guys got it good, getting a house under 600k is almost impossible here :(
 
IN our Prices, that is cheap for our house. You cannot get much under 500,000. I like the concept of this house. The extra that you might pay for this will mean that you are saving alot more in the long run, which is a win/win solution,
 
Now that is really cool!! I'll have to track these guys so when I finally move someplace semi-permanently I can have them build my house.
 
Large energy consumption is one of the problems America faces today. Techmology like this will help with that. Good news.
 
The thing that seems to be missing in this discusion is the distinction between the cost of the land and the cost of building the house. I think that to build a house costs about 20 to 30 grand GBP, (30 - 45k dollars?). in the south of the UK, the land tends to be around 10 times this.

If this house costs close to 200,000 to build it is a shed lot. To be ecconomical (without costing the environmental cost) you want a return on investment of a maximum 8 years. So it shoud save you 20,000 dollars a year in fuel (if this costs 160,000 more than a normal house). My total domestic energy costs are around a tenth of this (I think) so I cannot see it being worth it.
 
30-45k dollars seems awfully few to build a house. around here a house (without the land) easily costs around CHF 500k (400k Dollars)
 
KaeptnOvi said:
30-45k dollars seems awfully few to build a house. around here a house (without the land) easily costs around CHF 500k (400k Dollars)
It seems like I was wrong. This site seems to say it would cost around 100,000 GBP ($170,000) to build a 2000 square foot house. I cannot belive it is that expensive, but I guess my figures must be wrong.
 
The actual building of the house itself would probably be well under $100,000. It's the exorbant land costs that make everything skyrocket.
 
Ahhh... sounds quite good :).

Though surely there are going to be *some* problems now... there always has to be progression before we can use anything to its maximum potential :).
 
Back
Top Bottom