300

It did not have any plot to speak of, sadly. All the good lines were just copied from ancient greek history. The rest of the (poor) attempts at a plot were below the level of a respectable tv show.
The battles looked good, but i do not think that any movie can survive on battle scenes alone.
 
My main problem is that I originally thought it was going to be some form of cinemasized version of the actual historical battle. Then I learnt it was going to be adapted from a Frank Miller film.

Now, I know that it's a different director/production team than Sin City, but if I were to see this film, would it require me giving up two hours of my life that I'm never going to get back? Don't get me wrong, I love grandiose battle sequences like the best of us, but I can't be bothered seeing an over the top, or over-pretentious film.

What I think I'm asking, is this along the same lines of such films like Gladiator? Not meant to be ripped apart, just to be watched and enjoyed?
 
My main problem is that I originally thought it was going to be some form of cinemasized version of the actual historical battle. Then I learnt it was going to be adapted from a Frank Miller film.

Now, I know that it's a different director/production team than Sin City, but if I were to see this film, would it require me giving up two hours of my life that I'm never going to get back? Don't get me wrong, I love grandiose battle sequences like the best of us, but I can't be bothered seeing an over the top, or over-pretentious film.

What I think I'm asking, is this along the same lines of such films like Gladiator? Not meant to be ripped apart, just to be watched and enjoyed?

Go see it for the art direction and fight sequences. In that regard, the movie is brilliant.

You won't really get the art direction if you don't realize it's based on a comic.. well, maybe.

Forget reality. enjoy movie.
 
This movie is unrequited American Propaganda, Heres Why:
(From another discussion Board:)
and I stand by my earlier comments about the fact that the story works best if you read it as a metaphor of the War on Terror, and that, being aware of it, but desperately trying to reverse the roles, the screenwriters have tried to make Leonidas some unlikely avatar of George W. Bush. This, obviously, spoiled what should have been good, bloodthirsty fun--imagine if the characters of "Sin City", say, were ranting about Roark being a closet liberal and the Old Town whores being the embodiment of all-American conservative values. I mean, that would make as much sense as the cringe-inducing lines in "300" about the Spartans fighting against "tyranny and mysticism" and for "reason and freedom".

I also find it annoying that "300" goes so far down the line of what one could call "ideological correctness", which is political correctness for right-wingers. Because the Spartans must absolutely represent the GOP's idea of heroism, all of a sudden they no longer have slaves (not one mention of slavery in the whole movie, but with all the male citizens off to war and the women raising the next generation of soldiers, who exactly gets the work done?), nor of course do they practice pederasty (in fact it's the Athenians who are explicitly referred to, dismissively, as "boy-lovers", and of course there's plenty of decadent bisexual stuff going on under Xerxes's tent). Worst of all, Leonidas is portrayed as a noble king who just has to circumvent the opposition of both the established clergy and the city's parliament to have his war (which a self-styled "politician" decries as "illegal", but then it turns out he was on the Persians' payroll all along).

Then there are unpleasant facts about the portrayal of the Persians themselves. As has already been observed in another thread, many of them look definitely African, while Xerxes himself is a hairless, copper-skinned giant. Much of the Persian army is actually made of sub-human creatures, snarling, misshapen beasts straight out of a white supremacist's nightmares, and the Greek traitor is severely misshapen. The Spartan oracles are warty monstrosities themselves, and, surprise, they're opposed to the war because they were bribed by the Persians.
 
I see where you are going with this, but unfortunately I don't share this view. Like Warpus said, kick back and relax, enjoy the show.

That's what I did. It was saturday, I had spare time, so i went to the theatre and watched the movie. I enjoyed it, it isn't the most meaningfull movie i ever seen, still it was a good show. And I won't nor do I want, actully going to write such an essay about it.
 
Seriously, people who try to make political affairs out of everything ruin perfectly fun movies.
 
I did not at all see Bush as Leonidas. And the war on terror obviously is not one where the terrorists outnumber the "forces of freedom", not to mention that the war between Greece and Persia was a lot more real.
The comic book, i suspect, functioned using a very basic distinction between good and evil, and such a distinction infests this film as well. The only connection with the war against terror is such simplicities imo.
 
Just as an added question:
How suitable is 300 as a date movie?

I've wathced it through limewire and am going to ask someone out with me to watch it on screen.

I can't really tell what makes a good date movie. I took someone once to see "An Inconvenient Truth"
 
Hhm there's a sex scene, so if you are going with subliminal route, why not.... :lol:
Oh no, I get squemish and cover my eyes when I see any sex scenes.

Not the best way to impress girls.
 
You serious? :lol:
Unfortunately yes.

I can look at people getting killed, massacred and tortued in the most horrible ways but when a sex scene comes on screen I cringe and look away.

I'll just time my visit to the bathroom on that time. Does anyone know what time the aforementioned sex scene comes in.
 
Unfortunately yes.

I can look at people getting killed, massacred and tortued in the most horrible ways but when a sex scene comes on screen I cringe and look away.

I'll just time my visit to the bathroom on that time. Does anyone know what time the aforementioned sex scene comes in.

Is it sex scenes, or nudity in general? If the latter, than you will need alot of bathroom trips...
 
Unfortunately yes.

I can look at people getting killed, massacred and tortued in the most horrible ways but when a sex scene comes on screen I cringe and look away.

I'll just time my visit to the bathroom on that time. Does anyone know what time the aforementioned sex scene comes in

What's so cringe-inducing about sex-scenes?

Well, when you see butt-naked (but no butt) Leonidas in his bedroom talking to his wife, wait until he joins her on the bed, and then go visit your bathroom... or just go when hes standing so its not obvious you want to miss the sex. :p

P.S what about the oracle scene before it? You going to stay for the drunken adolescent (hot) girl?
 
What's so cringe-inducing about sex-scenes?

Well, when you see butt-naked (but no butt) Leonidas in his bedroom talking to his wife, wait until he joins her on the bed, and then go visit your bathroom... or just go when hes standing so its not obvious you want to miss the sex. :p

P.S what about the oracle scene before it? You going to stay for the drunken adolescent (hot) girl?
What time are the scenes?

I have no idea, I can look at naked people but once they start doing it I look away automatically. Maybe I can do it in a less noticable fashion (like wiping my glasses when I see it on)
 
Yes, that would indeed be entirely non noticable.
You might as well say while doing it: "please do not be under the impression that now i am cleaning my glasses so as to avoid the s-s-s- (stuttering) sex scene".
 
Back
Top Bottom