5 industrial sets

Probably some esoteric issue, eg their length doesn't correspond to some unknown personal Godelization numbering system I use without being aware of it, or other stuff like that.

"Godelization ?" As in, "Gödel's Incompleteness Theory?" (In short, is the "proper" reply. " :confused: " or, " :cooool: " )
 
Probably some esoteric issue, eg their length doesn't correspond to some unknown personal Godelization numbering system I use without being aware of it, or other stuff like that.

"Godelization ?" As in, "Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem?" (In short, is the "proper" reply. " :confused: " or, " :cooool: " )
 
Yes, afraid so!
I am actually in the process of learning Godel/Turing and tied stuff, in order to run a future philosophy seminar on formal logic.

:eek: This is a complicate theme ! My respect. :hatsoff:

As Ozy posted, the correct spelling would be Gödel (with the letter ö). If this letter is not available on the keybord, a German substitute would be "oe", here: Goedel.
 
It is somewhat complicated, although thankfully by now I am dealing ok. It's not really having much math, though (only a known property of primes, some probability, at times using different numerical base, and for me more problematically the diagonalization process used to show difference between types of sets with infinite members).
The main complexity is in the so-called arithmetisation of (formal logic language) syntax, which is giving a specific numerical (natural numbers) value to all statements in the language.
 
I would like, if you would also post the buildings that you have made individually as separate images that can be used to paste on other layers. I am imagining, you make city's by first making individual pieces and then pasting them as a whole. From the previews It looks you have used separate pieces, the two iconic buildings, the church and others.

The issue with individual posting is that I will still have to make them have a one-color background, so it is some work :)
Another issue - important for me, due to OCD - is that they won't look that good on their own anyway :D
 
Yes, afraid so!
I am actually in the process of learning Godel/Turing and tied stuff, in order to run a future philosophy seminar on formal logic.

What? No Bayesian Logic? Without knowing that, how can you possibly hope to withstand the AI Apocalypse?

:D
 
upload_2020-12-8_22-36-27.png


It's not close to being finished.
 
Kyriakos... I also like the Set as you have it on Post #14. It appeared less congested with Good Texture, Color, Shading and Contrast. I did not see anything that could be improved as all appeared synergistic.
I do understand your position of being particular and always striving for perfection as you see it. Indeed, Perfection is in the eyes of the beholder.
 
You guys know what this means: it's unlikely I will ever release anything now :D

Besides, after my good monitor stopped working, I had to use a terrible ancient one which is ruinous for eyes due to screen noise.
 
Kyriakos... actually it means that your Work is so Good that even if not perfected as you see it, it is Excellent :cool:

Even with the screen noise from an old computer your Work is Superb... guess you use a a type of "Auto-Pilot" you have developed through doing so many Great City Sets :thumbsup:
 
While it's not what I would do, it does sort of remind me of my editing work back when I started making gfx for civ3, 15 (!) or something years ago...
Maybe you should try using some 3d gfx program, like Blender? You may have a good future in this :)
 
While it's not what I would do, it does sort of remind me of my editing work back when I started making gfx for civ3, 15 (!) or something years ago...
Maybe you should try using some 3d gfx program, like Blender? You may have a good future in this :)

Now that is about as high a praise as anyone around here can receive for making city sets! :dance:
 
Back
Top Bottom