666

[JIM JOIN JUMP]

The pastor said to me that the anti-christ was supposed to be born on at the 6th hour of the 6th day of the 6th month

is this tru

 

[Erik Mesoy]

Whose 6th month, 6th day of the week or the month, and 6th hour by what time zone?

Probably not.

 

[Sidhe]

Yes but the source of the numbers is actually from Jewish mysticism or Cabala Accrding to Birth day time of birth and a few other characteristics you end up at a number 666. Everyone can work out their own number I forget how it's done though.

Let he who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast for it is a human number: it's number is six hundred and three score six.

Revelations ?:? can't remember go look it up

The messaih it is said would have been 777. Which probably explains partly why seven is lucky.

EDIT:

Here is Wisdom: Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred and threescore and six

Revelations 13:18

 

[The Last Conformist]

This post is the obligatory reminded that many of the earliest manuscripts read "616".

 

[stormbind]

I might have the story wrong:

Apparently there were seven members of some kind of council, one of whom was Lucifer. The number seven comes up all the time in Christianity and is supposed to be a good number (though it seems to bring me bad luck).

Lucifer handed in his resignation, leaving only six. The number six is associated with the Devil, though it doesn't make much sense to me because six is the number left after he quit.

Based on this, some believe that anything with 777 is supposed to be good, and anything with 666 is supposed to be bad.

I was born with a load of 7s and am no God send, so these religious preachers probably got the numbers the wrong way round

Turned on it's head: 777 probably could mean tainted by Lucifer, and 666 could means purged of him

 

[ComradeDavo]

SATAN!



There is no anti-christ because there is/was no christ.

 

[Sidhe]

This post is the obligatory reminded that many of the earliest manuscripts read "616".

Interesting, anyway it equates with your mortal number according to Jewish astrology, 666 is probably a touch of artistic licence maybe I suspect you could work out exactly on which dates Satan's child could be born. Could be the 6th of June 2006? There's a thought or 6th of Jan 2006

The second coming(or messiah) heralds the coming of the Antichrist or is that the other way round, probably. Of course there is no antichrist yet, Revelations is a prophecy not a historical text, and it's pretty damn lunatic prophecy at that, have you read it, that guy was nuts, crazy as a loon. Still it's a damn site more believable than literal Creationism.

 

[Sahkuhnder]

Welcome to CFC and congratulations for jumping right into the thick of the fray.

Sorry I can't help much with your 666 question but it sounds like more old superstitious religious nonsense to me.

 

[Erik Mesoy]

SATAN!



There is no anti-christ because there is/was no christ.

There is not a miniature giant space hamster holding a hammer gun to your head and shouting "YOU MUST GIVE YOUR OPINION IN THIS THREAD".

So kindly don't troll like that.

 

[ComradeDavo]

There is not a miniature giant space hamster holding a hammer gun to your head and shouting "YOU MUST GIVE YOUR OPINION IN THIS THREAD".

So kindly don't troll like that.

Meh. Person registers, and their first post is 'the pastor told me the anti-christ is coming!!!'

Plus, their was no disclaimer saying 'athiests do not post'

Or does not believing in chris = trolling now?

 

[bhsup]

The pastor said to me that the anti-christ was supposed to be born on at the 6th hour of the 6th day of the 6th month

is this tru

It might be, it might not be. I personally think that's too simple an answer to the reference about the number in Revelation. Oh, and please don't ask me what it means. I've not enough wisdom to figure it out.

P.S. - Sidhe, I know it's nitpicky, but the book is actually "Revelation", non-plural, as in the Revelation of St. John at Patmos. It is certainly full of many revelations, but not in the title.

 

[Erik Mesoy]

Meh. Person registers, and their first post is 'the pastor told me the anti-christ is coming!!!'

Plus, their was no disclaimer saying 'athiests do not post'

Or does not believing in chris = trolling now?

No, but posting just to say "I don't believe in christ" in a thread regarding a christian religious subject is trolling. It's like going to this thread and saying that the earth is flat.

 

[Sidhe]

It might be, it might not be. I personally think that's too simple an answer to the reference about the number in Revelation. Oh, and please don't ask me what it means. I've not enough wisdom to figure it out.

P.S. - Sidhe, I know it's nitpicky, but the book is actually "Revelation", non-plural, as in the Revelation of St. John at Patmos. It is certainly full of many revelations, but not in the title.

Ah forget it those sort of corrections are fine by me, what I hate is Mesoy doing the grammar and spelling bit, it's extremely annoying not to mention against forum rules, if he does it just once more, I'm going to find out where he lives and force him to eat a dictionary page by page untill he pukes

BTW Erik that space hamster reference was very funny

 

[ComradeDavo]

No, but posting just to say "I don't believe in christ" in a thread regarding a christian religious subject is trolling. It's like going to this thread and saying that the earth is flat.

No it's not. The thread starter is asking if it's true that the anti-christ is going to be born. I say no it's not true, because Christ does not exist, therefore logically there is no anti-christ.

 

[bhsup]

Actually, the thread started asked if what his pastor said was true, that the anti-christ would be born on a specific day. He wasn't asking whether one thinks there really will be an anti-christ or not.

 

[ComradeDavo]

Actually, the thread started asked if what his pastor said was true, that the anti-christ would be born on a specific day. He wasn't asking whether one thinks there really will be an anti-christ or not.

So athiests are not allowed to post in this thread then?

 

[bathsheba666]

I was not born in June.

mwahahahah

 

[Phlegmak]

Do you want to know what the significance of 666 is? It's 333 multiplied by 2. It's also 600 + (22 * 3). It's also 11988 divided by 18. Amazing, isn't it?

 

[bhsup]

I didn't say atheists cannot post here, and didn't even imply it. You were just way off base on what the OP was asking, that's all.

 

[ComradeDavo]

I didn't say atheists cannot post here, and didn't even imply it. You were just way off base on what the OP was asking, that's all.

Why? Surely you can understand my viewpoint? That such a question is defunct because there is no christ/anti-christ?