Funny how birth rates have gone down in western countries as sex became more accepted, eh?
I'm sure there's a reason behind that besides how accepted it is.
Possibly how people care less and less about mass numbers of children since they're likely to live past childhood, and so make a point to have fewer kids who they can take care of very well?
Sometimes it's good to look at the exceptions rather than the rule, and try to find ways to eliminate those exceptions. Sex is something to be approached delicately to avoid ruining a child.
Regardless of whether one considers abortion moral or not, anyway, there's something that irks me about "have sex as much as you want and just abort it." I don't know what, since I'm not really pro-life.
A moderate pro-choice stance, like the one established in Roe v. Wade, is that abortion should be illegal if the fetus can be supported outside the womb, albeit with assistance. Technology will inevitably continue to advance. Therefore, I can say that most likely, one day far in the future, we could sustain a fetus from a lump of cells right up to 9 months.
At that point, abortion would be made illegal should the legal opinion remain, and even beyond that, I think it will rub many wrong to kill something if we could easily preserve it to what would be birth.
And not driving is the only foolproof way not to kill someone in a car accident.
There will be no people to murder or murderers if we don't give birth to them.
Never mind that cars are economically valuable. Rampant sex isn't.
