Maybe a general South African civ that encompasses Zimbabwe/Rowzi/Mutapa and gets re-spawns as Zulu and/or South Africa. Rather than including separate civs for each group, they could be represented by different leaders depending on civics and date - one for the earlier kingdoms since we don't have any sure knowledge of the kings of Zimbabwe, Shaka for the 1700s-1900s if under Chiefdom/Despotism/Monarchy, one of the white guys in the 1800-1900s if a European puppet or if Fascist, Mandela with Democracy and/or Egalitarianism, Mugabe with Communism.
That's like having an Australian civ that encompasses the Maori. Zimbabwe (the Bantu cultures there before colonialism and the modern Mugabe-created country) was never part of South Africa. Southern Rhodesia (the British colony that was there before Ian Smith declared independence and then had to hand the country over to Mugabe 15 years later) rejected joining South Africa after WWI, but the vote could have easily gone the other way, so Southern Rhodesia/Modern Zimbabwe could be historical/contested territory for the Boer civ, but Boer UHVs shouldn't involve Zimbabwe or Rhodesia.
If a South African civ is wanted, and I think it's a good idea to have one, it should be the Boers. Zululand is too small to make for a good civ, and I think Leoreth has rejected it in the past for that very reason...it's like Israel, Belgium, or Venice. The Boers also present an excellent opportunity for some interesting game mechanics, namely having enemy units within a 5-tile radius lose 10% of their HP when a Boer unit is defeated (representing the bittereinders, and the guerilla warfare that characterized the end of the Second Boer War), and having a UHV that involves getting invited to at least 2 World Congresses (representing Jan Smuts, the great South African statesman, the only person to sign peace treaties that ended both world wars). Also, the Boers beat the British Empire once, and almost did it a second time.
I agree with this. We should wait until the new large map gameplay and mechanics become stable.
I agree, but the most essential civs for the new map, in my opinion, are the Boers, Australians, and Swahili. The other civs which I would like aren't as necessary in terms of filling out underutilized areas of the map. (The Manchu overlap almost completely with China, Sweden overlaps almost completely with the current iteration of the Vikings, Kyivan/Kievan Rus overlaps almost completely with the current iteration of Russia, etc...). Also, the Boers and Australians are the two major post-colonial civs that are still missing. Peru still needs a UHV, but all the other major post-colonial civs (Canada, USA, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Gran Colombia) are there.