madscientist
RPC Supergenius
I have noticed in both my monarch BTS games (marathon/huge big/little map) that Cyrus is alot different.
He was extremely agressive, in a very strategic way. He waits until renansance, the picks one apponent, conquers then moves on. I lost my first Monarch game with mansa Musa becasue of him
Now in my current game with Roosevelt, I sign a defensive pact with him at pleased (the usual) even though we are different religions. Sitting Bull who is Cyrus neighbor attacks me ( a pitiful cheap naval landing), Cyrus goes to war with him for exactly 5 turns and sues for peace. After a short war, I get peace from sitting bull. Maybe 20 turns later Cyrus declares on me. Time goes on I sign another defensive pact with Cyrus. Isabella out of nowhere attacks with another poor naval attack, Cyrus declare on here (eventually vassals her) but now I have taken a hit on relations, no longer pleased but caurious even at war witht eh same opponent (now I get -4 penalty for you have traded with out worse enemies. Late in the industrial age I have a good tech lead over him, He goes to war with Ramses II who is his neighbor for no apparent reason other than a different reason. The game is still playing but I would not be surprised to find a fleet or persion tanks on my shores and a hundred years.
Had anyone seen this side of Cyrus before. In all my warlord games I have never seen this, he has always been peaceful and easy to please. Very loyal if you sign a defensive pact and unbribable. Now he is almost worse than the othe AI maniacs, he is unpredictable and seams to make war like Shaka, very well.
Was he changed somehow with BTS? I would not be dissapointed is he was because I think this Cyrus better plays to his traits.
He was extremely agressive, in a very strategic way. He waits until renansance, the picks one apponent, conquers then moves on. I lost my first Monarch game with mansa Musa becasue of him
Now in my current game with Roosevelt, I sign a defensive pact with him at pleased (the usual) even though we are different religions. Sitting Bull who is Cyrus neighbor attacks me ( a pitiful cheap naval landing), Cyrus goes to war with him for exactly 5 turns and sues for peace. After a short war, I get peace from sitting bull. Maybe 20 turns later Cyrus declares on me. Time goes on I sign another defensive pact with Cyrus. Isabella out of nowhere attacks with another poor naval attack, Cyrus declare on here (eventually vassals her) but now I have taken a hit on relations, no longer pleased but caurious even at war witht eh same opponent (now I get -4 penalty for you have traded with out worse enemies. Late in the industrial age I have a good tech lead over him, He goes to war with Ramses II who is his neighbor for no apparent reason other than a different reason. The game is still playing but I would not be surprised to find a fleet or persion tanks on my shores and a hundred years.
Had anyone seen this side of Cyrus before. In all my warlord games I have never seen this, he has always been peaceful and easy to please. Very loyal if you sign a defensive pact and unbribable. Now he is almost worse than the othe AI maniacs, he is unpredictable and seams to make war like Shaka, very well.
Was he changed somehow with BTS? I would not be dissapointed is he was because I think this Cyrus better plays to his traits.