Nothing has changed from yesterday. What you did yesterday was standard scum behavior. I am totally expecting your scum buddy to follow your vote.
Vote: Zack
"Standard scum behavior" in what way? Your insistence on vagueness is frustratingly unproductive.
And if you ever think a Zack/Visor scum team would be so blatant, you are sadly mistaken. Seeing as I don't think you've ever actually been in a game where I was scum, combined with your "case" against me you (obviously) don't know how I play as scum. If you look back at any game where I was scum, there was never ever such an obvious connection between myself and any teammates. In fact, when scum, I deliberately play in such a way that obfuscates such connections and subtly encourages people to think I'm teammates with the obvious candidate (see: me and glossy, Aspiring Rappers; me and guild, Mafia Champions; also see the lengths I went to distance myself from actual scum partners in those games).
These are your posts from yesterday.
1st you are undecided on Zack.
Then you follow Spaceman's case despite it being proved wrong.
And now you have an easy justification for a vote today.
None of what you said makes Zack scum.
Vote: Atheotes
Yep.
I dunno what to think. Whoever gets lynched has a 40% chance of being scum, so I think I can just wait and decide later today.
Uh, what?
Honestly, Zack didn't clear himself much yesterday.
I really should give up these games, I really can't play them.
Uh, what?
Please show me where it is "Proved wrong". If my justification for vote is easy, what do you call yours? And as i already stated and expected you simply followed your scumbuddies vote.
Uh, what? You admitted yourself why spaceman's argument was total crap:
I am still undecided on Zack. He is posting a lot without actually saying anything.
But as he mentioned he did the same in the recently concluded org game.
(I feel obligated to mention that you are misrepresenting me. I posted a lot of jokes early on and was lynched by a wagon composed of 100% scum. When I replaced in later, I was the most productive player and solved the game, including fingering you as mafia when no one else saw it.)
Here is the link to the game for anyone interested. Notice my behavior and notice atheote's.
He was scum.
This is deliberately misleading. The following are facts:
- You were mafia. choxorn was not.
- You repeatedly insisted choxorn was mafia, day after day, because he wasn't posting a lot and obviously this made him scum.
- For that matter, you tried to accuse me based on similar reasoning.
- choxorn was converted to the cult at the last second, well after you had already been accusing him.
Nice try.
So I was seeing the dearth of activity today and I tried to apply that thing with the probabilities, which I shouldn't cause I have never touched upon that branch of maths, but oh well.
Suppose you vote randomly every day, but you only vote once. So you grab your D1 vote, it has a 22% chance to be Mafia (assuming 2 Mafia), then we lynched a town and then a townie got killed. That's a 44% chance that goes to the other guys so you get 6 people who have a 30% chance each to be Mafia and your 22% guy, so you vote someone else. then that guy gets lynched and another townie gets killed, that's 52% gone, which distributes... actually the guy I voted for is the dead one, so it's back to the drawing board. I'm completely stupid.
So yeah, 40% for everyone, so it's very likely that one of Zack or atheotes is scum.
I'm just getting depressed over this business. This must be the most boring game I've been in.
Uh, what?
We need all 3 townies to vote together to lynch the mafia. It would be criminal to not vote. If you think one of us is scum vote for that person.
If you are not sure, then atleast support my vote.
You can read back Zack and Visor's posts. Visor is clearly supporting Zack without any reason.
(bold mine)
You clearly supported spaceman "without any reason", so obviously you are scum buddies.
Certainly! We need to be unanimous, that's why I'm withholding my vote till I can decide, I'm just not sure. Even if I was guilty of kickstarting the Zack wagon, it didn't have much of a base. a
I mean it could always be that spaceman was a scanner and saw Zack doing things at night, but then he'd have roleclaimed, right? So I wouldn't count on that. Then there is the possibility that one of the nightkills was on a scanner, of course. But this brings us nowhere. See? I can't play this. I get enmeshed in endlessly branching trees and get nothing clear out of them.
Not that Zack and Visor have anything on you, either. I guess this is as good a chance as we'll get, so I'll vote: Zack
Uh, what?
Look back yesterday. spaceman (and by extension, atheotes) case has absolutely no bearing, he even retracted it after eventually admitting how wrong it was. atheotes is trying to run with an easy case to lock the game up. He has never, not once in this game, actually shown a genuine attempt at scum-hunting. Look at the post where Visor quotes all of atheotes' posts, it's damning.
If you're not scum, you are making a mistake. Read the thread, there's not much. Make your own decision, don't let atheotes make it for you.
