sufficiency
King
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2013
- Messages
- 682
So I've been thinking...
In many of the other scenarios so far, the leaders are often "substituted". e.g. in the Mongol scenario, Ramky is in it to represent a Northern-China civ. Doing so really doesn't matter too much IMO, because few people actually know what they were in history. The same applies to the Into the Renaissance scenario.
But now with the US Civil War scenario, I wonder how the leaders will be done. It feels to me that putting "George Washington" for the Union side will probably be a bad idea (because it would be grossly inaccurate and everyone knows it).
Perhaps what will happen is that they will make an animated Lincoln for the scenario; then America will have two potential leaders to play against.
In many of the other scenarios so far, the leaders are often "substituted". e.g. in the Mongol scenario, Ramky is in it to represent a Northern-China civ. Doing so really doesn't matter too much IMO, because few people actually know what they were in history. The same applies to the Into the Renaissance scenario.
But now with the US Civil War scenario, I wonder how the leaders will be done. It feels to me that putting "George Washington" for the Union side will probably be a bad idea (because it would be grossly inaccurate and everyone knows it).
Perhaps what will happen is that they will make an animated Lincoln for the scenario; then America will have two potential leaders to play against.