Ani Taneen
Warlord
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2015
- Messages
- 278
Okay!
I thought the reason was to allow cities that otherwise wouldn't fit. (i.e. Prague, Lyons, both Warsaw and Cracow at once)And the reason for a larger map is that things are not so crowded anymore.
Fair enough. In my opinion, it's better to overcrowd then to omit something important.Less so.
Do you think that Warsaw, Cracow, and Prague all coexisting at once is feasible?No, I don't really think Königsberg in particular is compatible with other desirable cities in the region. But that's fine, different games can show different configurations of these cities.
Can't that be done with settler maps?To be honest, it's tough. You probably wouldn't get the AI to found them.
What does that even mean, "consider Königsberg"?Can't that be done with settler maps?
(Also, would you be willing to consider Koenigsberg if I made a good enough case for it?)
I'm not sure about others, but I'd rather Korea not be shrunk to the point that North and South Korea can't be separate civs. I want my Korean Split!
I mean that if I present my case for including Koenigsberg and Danzig both on the map will you consider preplacing them both for the 1700 AD scenario?What does that even mean, "consider Königsberg"?