Temujin8k
Fluyts, Grand Vizier of Your Mind
I really like what you did to the Philippines, I'll implement these changes as soon as I can. One thing, though. Considering the size of the Philippines, I'd opt for a two cities setup, probably Davao and Manila, therefore, the Copper should be moved to a tile where it can be worked by at least one of those two cities. (Realism is great, but we should always think of gameplay, and having the copper out of reach of those cities would only make them sub-par. Generally, Korea and Indonesia have to be reworked again, as I made them too small (although, I think two cities for Korea are enough)
Well, maybe because I'm biased about this I wanted to make a 3-city Philippines possible, especially because aside from historical significance it also has economic significance. At least in the Philippines. It's the most developed city in the Visayas (central PH Islands), actually. As a Filipino I just felt like Cebu really had to be there. (I hope inthesomeday agrees with me on this...

Spoiler :
(Random fact: I am actuallly from Davao, but I am currently studying in Manila right now. Still, I really want Cebu present.
)

About the copper,... why did I just realize that now? We can put copper instead of gold on the Butuan tile. Scrap the gold, I guess, but it's fine. I missed that, apologies!
Concerning Florence, I think the tile added to Italy makes Italy look weird. Just place Florence one tile north. This would prevent having Florence and Milan at the same time, but having both cities would be a bad idea anyways, as this would rob those cities of some much needed space.
Point taken. I guess I'm the only one who does not find it weird. Oh, spatial constraints.

I've done something similar already, as I designed the entire map around what I considered the 'canonical city placement'. (I.e. there always can be Lübeck instead of Hamburg or Florence instead of Milan, but generally there are similar same spots for cities to appear in game). While your take often agrees with what I envisioned, there are other notable changes, particularly in In north America. I think you got the geography wrong, I.e. some cities like Vancouver or New York are far from where they should be.
Oh, I haven't seen it; was looking for that. I actually had a hard time in North America. Thing is, I merely based on Google Maps because (1) repeated Alt+Tab is so annoying and takes a long time, and (2) I don't have an RFC modmod map to base city placements on, unlike RFCE/SoI/RFCA. I took into account the difference in the type of projections used in your RFC map and in Google Maps as well as relative distances to certain geographical features, but when I looked at Google Maps, Washington and New York looked really near. Which one is wrongly placed, Washington or New York? I'm guessing it's Washington--I may have estimated placement wrongly.
Currently you already have to choose between Milan and Florence, which is fine considering the scale of either map. Having Milan in 3000 BC and 1700 AD and Florence in 600 AD is fine imo.
Also, please convert bitmaps to a compressed format in the future, that was a 4 MB image download![]()
Oh well, I guess there's no option--one has to go... :'(

I actually planned to do that right away, but I still had to install Microsoft Office Picture Manager 2010 on my laptop before I could easily batch convert them to PNG format since I forgot to do so when I got this laptop. Forgot to get back on it since I was cramming for an exam early today. Anyway, it's in progress already, the Google Drive folder should be updated by now. Again, my apologies.

Last edited: