America: Write Your Own History

Nay If we were to win, then there would just be a civil war between the Trotskyists and the capitalists and the socialists after we win. America does not need another civil war.

We will fail if we aren't united! The Trotskyists at least respect democracy, we can't afford to be picky with our allies.
 
We will fail if we aren't united! The Trotskyists at least respect democracy, we can't afford to be picky with our allies.

OOC: Can you please tell me where Foster violated the Constitution in the Main storyline made by RT? Anything not stated by him is non canon and usually propaganda. I'm being serious with this question.
 
Just in case the other Anti-Fosterites couldn't make it to the Paris conference (in the group), i am putting the first proposal here

note: Only secession leaders and Anti-Fosterites can vote
===============================================

4th International: The United Front Proposal #1
Unite the states who seceded to form the Union of the United States of New Rome
(name can be changed)

Long long ago in a small backwater peninsula, a group of men rebelled against their corrupt overlords and formed a republic that would change the world.

Not so long ago, a group of developing regions revolted against a much worse autocracy and now have history in their hands.

America has often been compared to the Roman Empire, and if we are to win this war we must unite and defeat the Fosterites to form a new stronger America

A happy America free from the evils of Stalin's Gulags and Foster's Purges

It is time to shape history

VOTE:
Yea, Let's unite into one state
Nay, we want to choose our regions own destinies, even if we might be conquered!
Other, post your opinions

I vote Yea.
 
Forster arrested!


More and more party members are disgusted by the oppression of Forster's administration. Some of them sued him to the supreme court for treason, and specifically oppressing free speech and free election. The court accepted the lawsuit and ordered his arrest.

Forster ordered the chiefs of police to arrest the judge. Chief of police disobeyed Forsters claimed that he only obey the law and the constitution. Forster tried unsuccessfully further to control the police, but most policemen decided that they will obey the law and the supreme court. Police managed to arrest Forster and the rest of his ministers. His trial is scheduled from tomorrow. It is the first time in American history, a president is arrested for treason!
What rubbish this "News of the World" tabloid has become.
 
OOC: Can you please tell me where Foster violated the Constitution in the Main storyline made by RT? Anything not stated by him is non canon and usually propaganda. I'm being serious with this question.

I have the same question actually. RT hasn't said anything about repressive laws being passed by this government but was very clear about the same being passed by Wilson during his presidency.
 
I have the same question actually. RT hasn't said anything about repressive laws being passed by this government but was very clear about the same being passed by Wilson during his presidency.

Arresting a senator for trying to sue the US government for Violating the 4th amendment. Restricting free speech which was confirmed by Foster himself when he said "Some speech is freer than others".
 
"Some speech if freer than others".

All freedoms anywhere in the world come with 'reasonable restrictions' . Even in a democratic society you're not allowed to say anything you want especially not something seditious. I don't know any government that would actually tolerate seditious speech or literature and not prosecute the person responsible for it. And the USSA's facing a civil war ! There has been a civil war before which saw some freedoms being clamped down this was never questioned for its legality. Only now am I seeing people actually raising this question. Even when RT hasn't laid out exactly how far the repressive laws have gone. He hasn't clarified about the gulags either or Stalin's relation with Foster.
 
:agree: Also, RT never said those corporations weren't bought so you can just assume he didn't violate the 4th.
 
:agree: Also, RT never said those corporations weren't bought so you can just assume he didn't violate the 4th.

Yeah no. It's better to assume that not all of them just sold instead of trying to tough it out until the next election as that's more realistic. Also must I mention the suspension of Habeas Corpus?
 
Yeah no. It's better to assume that they not all of them just sold instead of trying to tough it out until the next election as that's more realistic. Also must I mention the suspension of Habeas Corpus?
Considering the war has ended in the main portion of the USSA, why are the restrictions on speech and civil liberties necessary within the lower 48?
 
Second reconstruction apparently. Dixie is doing its best to cause as much havoc with the commies as possible.
But such restrictions and the lack of an opposition are precisely why another revolution is feared and civil unrest is heightening.
 
Looks like Browder will win this one. I haven't won an election since.... Debs. Wow.
 
Last I checked the votes for the party was tied with the votes for revolution. Now abstentions are reduced to 1. Now this is a complex situation with just 1.5 hours to spare. Now with this situation I don't know what RT would do.

Actually it's 6 for the commies and 7 for the revolution now. Unless you were one of the rioters and switched. So basically unless someone switches sides from rioting to voting or changing to peaceful protest then the communists are going down.(Excluding Moai and the Trotskyists considering they actually care about the Constitution and have helped the rebels.)
 
you're right. Well they're going down it seems :) . Though its still not been specified by RT what 'revolution' would mean here. Considering the posts made by Moai and others I think it would most likely mean that the secessionists would consolidate their own independent entity and defend this new entity. The provinces within the US which voted in support of revolution would secede from the USSA. This won't change the mainland USSA. At the end it looks more like a give and take compromise than a real revolution since USSA would remain under communist rule with Browder in charge. But that's all up to RT . I don't think he would want a collapse. This is the best way I think in which both sides can be represented without collapsing America :) .
 
Back
Top Bottom