America: Write Your Own History

[TheNoob]

Foster. The war with Argentina was unnecessary, and hopefully Foster can set it right. Changed vote

 

[Imperator Knoedel]

Foster, duh.

 

[Spirictum]

Can anyone remember an administration that was more extremist right-wing than Bruce's? Stolen bread and circuses at home, unbridled and cynical imperialism everywhere else.

However did that warmongering monster ever get mistaken for a socialist?



I can understand why you would think so, comrade, but my vote is for King. Apart from state property, Foster's record and agenda comes across as more cynically opportunistic than leftist.

Candidate Smith of the Democrats perhaps deserves an 'honorable mention', as I too would like to see the outgoing "President" prosecuted, although in my opinion it should be for electoral fraud, in that he masqueraded as a socialist.

Please tell me more about the Court of Conciliation and Arbitration. Specifically:
1. Has it brought about any benefit for the common working man, or does it side with the employer or the "status quo" in virtually all cases?

2. Have industrial "accidents", poisons/pathogens and other hazards been largely eliminated? Given the current level of our technology, it is not unreasonable to set one's expectations this high.

3. Did remuneration (of genuine workers not corporate fat-cats like CEOs and board members) at least keep pace with inflation during Bruce's term?

I must applaud you for your words! Indeed Bruce's term was a total mess.

The war against Argentina was totally unnecessary, and Bruce calling himself a socialist was a bad joke. It's a shame we got his Presidency in our records. Bruce was a shame to America.

And it's good to see not every commie just bow to 'State Property'. Your analysis on Foster was great, he seems as communist as Bruce seems socialist. I hope this brings light to the other commies to change their vote to someone who will not ruin America.

If Foster wins we will probably need to start a revolution, because by his profile I'm sure his intention is to change to Autocracy, Totalitarianism and Industrialism, something we cannot allow.


I was divided between voting for King or Smith, but I guess it's King now!

Gogogo CANADA!



Vote Woodsworth King! For the sake of America!

 

[Royal Tenenbaum]

Can anyone remember an administration that was more extremist right-wing than Bruce's? Stolen bread and circuses at home, unbridled and cynical imperialism everywhere else.

Bruce is very center. Lockwood would have been way more rightist than Bruce had she not been a feminist. In fact, I doubt she'd be okay with the communist movement as it is.

Candidate Smith of the Democrats perhaps deserves an 'honorable mention', as I too would like to see the outgoing "President" prosecuted, although in my opinion it should be for electoral fraud, in that he masqueraded as a socialist.

Want me to hold a referendum?

Please tell me more about the Court of Conciliation and Arbitration. Specifically:
1. Has it brought about any benefit for the common working man, or does it side with the employer or the "status quo" in virtually all cases?

As Stanley Bruce hired mostly the opposition, the Communists, to run the Court, it has largely benefited the common man, curbed the income inequality on top of the socialist programs already in place from the Debs administration, and shown to bring us out of the economic stall we had and is now gradually improving the economy on top of the war.

2. Have industrial "accidents", poisons/pathogens and other hazards been largely eliminated? Given the current level of our technology, it is not unreasonable to set one's expectations this high.

America is one of the least polluting nations in the world per capita, even beating small nations like Peru. The only things that can help hazards are the discovery and genetics and future technology.

3. Did remuneration (of genuine workers not corporate fat-cats like CEOs and board members) at least keep pace with inflation during Bruce's term?

Pay has increased, and union costs have decreased due to the CCA (Court of Conciliation and Arbitration)

 

[Royal Tenenbaum]

Democratic Party Holds Referendum!



Capitalizing on the rising unpopularity of the Argentina-American War after-effect, the Democratic Party has petitioned for Stanley Bruce to be impeached before election; distributing his votes elsewhere (those who voted for him would have to revote) and retiring presidency to Vice-President John Baird, modest conservative who is non-confrontational and very compromising. His presidency would last from August 1928 (now) to inauguration on March 4, 1929.


Referendum:
Impeach President Bruce and Charge him in Court?
Yes 3
No 2

 

[DKVM]

Referendum: Yes

 

[mrrandomplayer]

Did Congress pass a declaration of war? If so, I don't see how he violated the Constitution, as much as I disagree with his war.

 

[Royal Tenenbaum]

Did Congress pass a declaration of war? If so, I don't see how he violated the Constitution, as much as I disagree with his war.

With about 65% of Congress being part of the Socialist Coalition, and being told that Argentina's government was corrupt and that riots and dissidence were occurring in the Argentine cities, Congress did approve of the war. Some notable Communist senators also approved, as it promised to improve the economy, possibly ruin Bruce's public image, and socialize Argentina.

 

[TheNoob]

As much as I didn't like the war, I don't see how it is unconstitutional. No.

 

[baseballpie]

If he is impeached, then I see stronger opposition to Foster.

Even though I like the guy's policy, Yes

 

[Royal Tenenbaum]

And who do you vote for?

 

[baseballpie]

Oh yes. Hull

 

[mrrandomplayer]

With about 65% of Congress being part of the Socialist Coalition, and being told that Argentina's government was corrupt and that riots and dissidence were occurring in the Argentine cities, Congress did approve of the war. Some notable Communist senators also approved, as it promised to improve the economy, possibly ruin Bruce's public image, and socialize Argentina.

If that's the case, then as much as I dislike his foreign policy, I will vote No, since he hasn't violated the constitution.

 

[Royal Tenenbaum]

Also, I extend to those who voted for King or Thomas to create a Coalition of Opposition against Foster for this election. What do you guys say?

 

[DKVM]

Also, I extend to those who voted for King or Thomas to create a Coalition of Opposition against Foster for this election. What do you guys say?

NOOOOO!!!!!!

Why do all of you hate communists sooooo much!!!!????

 

[baseballpie]

Also, I extend to those who voted for King or Thomas to create a Coalition of Opposition against Foster for this election. What do you guys say?

A wholehearted, emphasized, YES

 

[Royal Tenenbaum]

NOOOOO!!!!!!

Why do all of you hate communists sooooo much!!!!????

I've looked up Foster more, and he's a supporter of Stalinist Russia, an anti-Trotskyist, and an overall world domination type of guy. Changing the economy civic from environmentalist to State Property will not only cause huge increases in pollution and a dying population, but it'll leave the nation vulnerable to recessions.

But as you can see, I try to be neutral and roleplay for whoever is voted in, so if he is elected I will roleplay him unbiasedly.

 

[DKVM]

If that's the case, then as much as I dislike his foreign policy, I will vote No, since he hasn't violated the constitution.

Anyone who voted no for reasons like the ones stated above are not true politicians. A true politician would do anything to get rid of opposing politicians and place their own people in power. Now baseballpie, him I can respect. A true politician there, even if he does support my candidate's opposition.

 

[DKVM]

I've looked up Foster more, and he's a supporter of Stalinist Russia, an anti-Trotskyist, and an overall world domination type of guy. Changing the economy civic from environmentalist to State Property will not only cause huge increases in pollution and a dying population, but it'll leave the nation vulnerable to recessions.

But as you can see, I try to be neutral and roleplay for whoever is voted in, so if he is elected I will roleplay him unbiasedly.

Foster isn't the kind of communist I would have wanted voted in but I want at least one victory for the Communist Party before the endgame.

 

[Royal Tenenbaum]

I plan for endgame to be 2020. Then there will be an off-shoot (maybe) where we start at the Civil War again, and after that an off-shoot into the distant future.