Again, False Choice. My point 2 was "2- option to get the DD via steam, authenticate installation online with steam, then not require steam to run in the background to play a single-player game offline". Using steam to authenticate a DD is fine with me as I clearly said.
I feel we're going around in circles here. One time authentication is no use if then the person can zip it up and distribute it to whoever. The whole point of the 'keep it running in the background' is kinda instrumental to the point of DRM.
And it's that kind of DRM you're going to get regardless as while they are eminently crackable they are a lot harder to crack, and thus by the time they
have been cracked a lot of legit copies have been sold. Job done. That's why DRM exists otherwise they could just require the DVD be in the drive and have done with it.
What you're saying is 'I don't want steam, I want an even less punishing DRM than that' but that's not going to happen in this present climate. Get used to it. Steam is WAY better than any other VIABLE choice they have. Of course there are other methods that would be better for YOU. But guess what? You haven't pumped millions of dollars of development costs into Civ 5. I'm
pretty sure it's up to them, not you. ;D So you're not going to play it because of that. Fair enough. I just think it's silly. You're missing out on what I imagine is a pretty important game for most people here, and doing it out of principle is pointless and misdirected IMO.
When it comes to principles like this, which on the face of it seem rather noble, you don't rebel against those being as reasonable as possible, you rebel against the worst of the worst.
The ones doing the real damage. Not just throwing a wobbler whenever you're slightly inconvenienced by a product and throwing the word 'petition' and 'boycott' around like they're going out of fashion, as this just gets in the way of fighting against genuine wrongdoings in the industry and makes internet boycotters look like
spoilt brats. So all in all it does more harm than good, really. Good being no good at all as a petition signed by a few hundred people, even to a community aware company like Firaxis, matters
not a jot on a gargantuan issue like DRM (will be Take Two's call anyway) that has probably had 6 months of development time already spent on it.
At least go after Ubisoft, geez.